Lemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the left
Lemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the left
您正在查看线程的一部分.
显示上下文
1821 留言
-
-
Go on…
-
Did you click the comment?
-
You’re right. Your comment was very well written, and backed up with so much evidence. I shouldn’t be questioning it.
-
Thank you, glad you can admit when you're wrong. It shows growth.
-
Lol. Google “facetious” and “sarcasm”.
-
I can't unfortunately. Putin doesn't allow me to use google while I spread disinformatsiya
-
That made me laugh.
-
-
Also you should really do the same
-
It’s ok. Hard to pick up in text. An “/s” would have helped.
-
If your sarcasm needs an /s it's shit sarcasm and you've got terrible timing.
-
Kind of validating my sarcasm buddy. The point of sarcasm it’s hard to grasp. You can leave it now.
-
That's not the point of sarcasm. Do you even know your linguistics? Sarcasm has no point - No tonal conveyance really does - but if you wanna get theoretic with it the point of sarcasm is to deliver critique without the sting, or to subvert expectations and deliver a joke. There isn't a lot of methods of communication were the point of it is to be hard to understand - though some methods are of course used to carry dual meanings to different audiences.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1821 留言