Skip Navigation

Technology @lemmy.world

Florencia (she/her) @lemmy.blahaj.zone

3mo ago

People say they prefer stories written by humans over AI-generated works, yet new study suggests that’s not quite true

theconversation.com People say they prefer stories written by humans over AI-generated works, yet new study suggests that’s not quite true

Participants in a study were willing to spend just as much time and money on an AI-generated story as one they were told was written by a human.

People say they prefer stories written by humans over AI-generated works, yet new study suggests that’s not quite true

Hacker News @lemmy.bestiver.se

People say they prefer stories written by humans over AI, study says otherwise

theconversation.com /people-say-they-prefer-stories-written-by-humans-over-ai-generated-works-yet-new-study-suggests-thats-not-quite-true-251347

People say they prefer stories written by humans over AI, study says otherwise

4 0

You're viewing a single thread.

25 comments

AI-generated stories are stories written by humans, but watered-down and plagiarized. AI would not be able to write stories without ~~stealing~~ training from human-made stories.
- Human stories are also plagiarized
  
  Giving Shakespeare ye olde side eye
  
  Some human stories are plagiarized.
  Most human stories are similar to other stories without being plagiarized.
  ALL AI stories are plagiarized.
  
  Oh, so there are authors that never read a story before and just made it up in their heads?
  There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories.
  AI stories may be lacking in some respects, but you can't tell me human stories don't recycle the same tropes
  
  There is no real difference between AI and humans in respect to borrowing elements from other stories.
  I say this is a case of reductivism

25 comments