An AI avatar tried to argue a case before a New York court. The judges weren't having it.
A man appearing before a New York court got a scolding from a judge after he tried to use an avatar generated by artificial intelligence to argue his case.
You're viewing a single thread.
This shit, and later on in the article when it talks about an Arizona court using AI, makes me want to hate AI forever. Fuck this, man
A person has social anxiety, and that makes you hate AI? That sounds pretty ableist.
No. Try to think critically next time. AI has been mostly garbage which is why I dislike it. It should not be used in court. Did you even read the article? If so, re-read it
Yes, I did read it. I'm guessing you did not. if you had, you would know why he used the AI video. This was a very constructive use of AI that not only didn't hurt anyone, but helped someone with a problem.
They didn't have a problem that needed the AI to help. Unless the problem was "how do I get free advertising?". This other comment has the timestamp and video (https://sh.itjust.works/comment/17839497), and the judge specifically says that the defendant has been in that court many times before, and now that they have an AI business, suddenly they have a problem and need the AI, without informing the court of the "need" for such a tool.
