Despair Is Not an Option, So Here's What We Must Do by Bernie Sanders
We have got to take on Trump and the oligarchs. And the best way to do that is to educate and organize, educate and organize.
You're viewing a single thread.
First, give your lists to the DNC. Second, dismantle your grassroots campaign apparatus and leave everyone to fend for themselves as individuals with no organization to work with. Then sheepdog them to the Democrats so that Genocide Joe can do whatever he wants and no hint of resistance can be mainstreamed. Then tell people that you know how to organize and fight.
Anyways the title is correct but don't listen to Sanders, he doesn't organize jack. Instead, join a local socialist (or socialist-ish) organization and do your best to self-educate on socialism by reading key texts and humbling yourself as we are all taught false things that must be unlearned and replaced with correct historoes and depropagandized analysis.
What key texts?
I would recommend a mix of Marxist and anarchist founfational texts, media literacy snd historical texts, and modern summaries and topic-focused books. You can start wherever you'd like, but I usually recommend media literacy and history as they are immediately and widely useful and help open the door to the rest. So maybe an order like this to start:
That should set you up for the basics. Not joking - these are the basics that will allow you to communicate with the left and have a grasp of the analyses. There is much, much more to understand, and namely, none of what I've listed teaches how to organize or will make you sufficiently educated on the specific contexts in which we need organization. That is best done by joining an active socialist organization (not Trot and not a cult like Avakian stuff). This list is also low on topics of marginalization and combined struggle, which are important to read (e.g. Leslie Feinberg on trans liberation or du Bois on Pan Africanism), as it really is just the basics.
Replace Jakarta Method with If We Burn by the same author, it's much more relevant to political organizing at the level the left is at in the West and less of a "sins of the empire" thing.
It's a good book but the people that need to read it are those already trying to organize but stuck in an ineffective "horizontalism" rut.
Yes I should have put an asterisk there for Foucault at least. I have had many fights with faux-left Foucault appreciators that use him to avoid, e.g. having an anti-imperialist stance. I was listing him just for the context: it is good to know his terms and ideas, despite his influence being negative and incorrect for practical organization, so that one can enter and participate in left discourse. I should have made that a category and added Trotsky to it.
Debord is a bit separated from them, though. His work is actually a quite gokd Marxist expansion on the analysis of capitalist society and it presents no distraction from the necessity of its removal.
