Zohran Mamdani says 'I don't think we should have billionaires'
Mamdani, the presumptive Democratic nominee to be the next mayor of New York and a self-identified democratic socialist, said Sunday billionaires contribute to inequality.
您正在查看单个线程.
I'm not against people having money, but to have a thousand times more than most people can make in their entire lifetime is just taking it too far. There should be a cap after which you pay 90% tax or something
Check the progressive taxation we had in the US after WW2 when, barring the racism/sexism/otherisms, the US actually thrived and single income families could manage being middle class, and owning a nice home. Reagan fucked us, but if it hadn't been him it would have been another terrible regressive.
All these conservative lapdogs continue to fuck us all with their single issue voting and sticking it to the libs.
I'm pretty judgy right now so imo anybody voting for GOP candidates in the US is either gullible, brainwashed, semi/fully mentally deficient, or is so racist or scared of other people's peepees that they will vote against their own best interests.
Problem is billionaires don't make "income" and it's quite difficult to even know what they own, let alone how to tax something like unrealized gains on stock holdings that they are using as leverage to get loans
At some point, somebody convinced people that unrealized gains were not actually income because you don't know for sure that you'd make that money, and I think that was a bad idea. Maybe unrealized gains aren't 1:1 the same thing as income, but the calculations of an income equivalent aren't going to be complicated.
Somehow property taxes are okay, though, even though we haven't realized the gains!
This exactly. At some threshold of worth, you should get taxed an amount based on your worth that will be big enough to force you to realize some gains in order to pay it.
The issue with realizing the gains is that you have to relinquish control of your company bit by bit. However, you could have the company (which you likely control) give out dividends, or you could use the stock as collateral for a loan. Or just pay yourself a bigger salary.
This is a good question: is it okay for you as a person to control a company that has grown that large? Maybe nudging people to give up control of entities that large is a good side effect.
Give up control to whom? Some megacorp with infinite money would just buy a majority stake (often referred to as a hostile takeover) and wind up owning everything to an even larger extent than today.
The employees who actually create the wealth. That’s to whom control should go
Sure, but that's not what's going to happen as a side effect of taxing unrealized gains, like what was discussed in this thread until now. A gradual transfer of ownership to the workers would have to be nudged in some other way.
In competitive industries (read: tech) this does happen to some extent in the form of stock being part of the compensation, but that's not going to happen organically for every employment situation.
Try being rich you fucking idiot
It's a joke y'all, damn. Just pull up on your boots or whatever it is these rich people did to turn on the money
Fucking peasant, has even tried buying some money?
Lol this guy gets it
My favorite tax policy hack for that last part is for the government to require a billionaire to formally declare the value of each of their assets (for purposes of calculating taxes).. with the stipulation that the government can choose to buy such an asset from the billionaire at the declared value at any time.
Gets to market rate real quick.
If only there was an entire federal agency whose sole job would be to track them down and tax them.
You can have a person be full-time managing the billionaire's case, still a very strong net win.
And even if hypothetically the cost of tracking their wealth outpaced the income generated by the tax, it's still a societal positive by reducing inequality, which is the root of most problems.
you don't tax the income. you tax luxury expenditure.
if they commission a yacht, they pay 200% tax on that. if they charter a jet, they pay 500% tax on that spend. if they retain a jet, they pay 800% tax on all its expenses from hangar parking to servicing to everything else.
the tax on any car above a guideline value should increase 1% for every 1% increase in value of the car. say, you pay 1% tax for a 1000 dollar car, 50% for a 1500 dollar car, 100% for a 2000 dollar car, 300% for a 4000 dollar car and so on. and not just on the sticker price, but on every service attached to that vehicle (insurance, maintenance, etc.) for its life.
similarly for luxury hotels, clothing, jewellery, watches, golf and ski resorts, and marriages in venice.
Yeah, cuz people obviously don't store wealth in bank accounts or investment properties and/or shell corporations.... That's why the Caymans are famous for their shellfish and local hospitality, and Bezos' ex-wife didn't end up getting much cash in their divorce.
It's also fortunate that these idiots haven't figured out that they could probably have a (few) companies that hold things (excuse my rough terminology for this concept I just now came up with) maybe even purchase them too - like jets, cars, maybe yachts even - and not have to pay any of those taxes!
Man, i hope word doesn't get out about this!
thousand times
Oh buddy that's peanuts
the average person could probably earn $100,000,000 if they invested their money well and used all opportunities to make more. lawyers median annual wage is $145,760 which gets fairly close within 80 years of 4% interest.
the average person could probably earn $100,000,000 if they invested their money well and used all opportunities to make more.
Is this counting like, if I invested instead of using that money for rent and food??
yes, just grow your own on your farm your ancestors left you
I’m not against people having money
It's been an archaic and backwards system for managing collective wealth for over a century.
We're living in an era of unprecedented surpluses. But we're still gatekeeping the most rudimentary essentials of daily life behind a paywall.
I am absolutely against people having money. All money causes is grief, anxiety, and depravation.
Why not just have a cap? 90% still means that they can further accumulate wealth, and taxes means they will try to dodge them.
They used to dodge 90% taxes by reinvesting in their workers and their company's reputation. That way the company would last a hundred years and continue to pay out your family for generations, and all you've gotta do is hire people to keep it running.
Fuck that, 99.99% and they'd still have more than we could earn in a lifetime, fuck that and fuck them.
