Shaking the world: China’s challenge to US monopoly

This was an interesting read. It begins with what looks like a bunch of AI-generated boilerplate about China's amazing economic stats, mixed with occasional one-liners of heavy-handed propagandizing:

Chinese economic development and US capital accumulation
US imperialism cannot tolerate such threats to its monopoly power

Then turns into a (slightly) more subtle analysis, with a tacit admission that Chinese communism is a fraud:

There have been significant defeats for the Chinese working class under this system, with the reemergence of private healthcare and education being emblematic of deepening inequality from the 1990s.

And concludes with what appears to be a warning that the Chinese "bourgeoisie" is getting uppity and wants to make its country into a new imperium to take over the USA's role of oppressing the world's poor.

Interesting, not entirely without insights, but still. All this is in the name of defending "revolutionary communism", an ideology that gave us nothing but a century of poverty, oppression and bloodshed. Ultimately, the source lacks credibility.

2 comments

Another cheap propaganda from the .ml comms without content.
This was an interesting read. It begins with what looks like a bunch of AI-generated boilerplate about China's amazing economic stats, mixed with occasional one-liners of heavy-handed propagandizing:
Chinese economic development and US capital accumulation
US imperialism cannot tolerate such threats to its monopoly power
Then turns into a (slightly) more subtle analysis, with a tacit admission that Chinese communism is a fraud:
There have been significant defeats for the Chinese working class under this system, with the reemergence of private healthcare and education being emblematic of deepening inequality from the 1990s.
And concludes with what appears to be a warning that the Chinese "bourgeoisie" is getting uppity and wants to make its country into a new imperium to take over the USA's role of oppressing the world's poor.
Interesting, not entirely without insights, but still. All this is in the name of defending "revolutionary communism", an ideology that gave us nothing but a century of poverty, oppression and bloodshed. Ultimately, the source lacks credibility.