The report concludes there is “credible evidence that UAP encounters can cause physical, physiological and psychological harm,” and calls for independent research, clinical training, specialist referral pathways, and far greater transparency between military and civilian health systems.

Its bottom line: treat UAP-linked cases with “scientific rigour” and patients “with care and respect.

“This document does not attempt to draw conclusions where evidence is lacking,” writes Dr Daniel Weaver, a GP, in a personal preface, framing the work as a cautious, evidence-informed review aimed at clinicians.

That caution is paired with unusually direct language for a medical brief.

The executive summary lists four takeaways:

1. UAP are real, as acknowledged by the U.S. and U.K. government reporting;
2. UAP can harm human health;
3. Radio-frequency and microwave exposure appears to be a common mechanism; and
4. Civilians—and their doctors—lack access to much of the relevant knowledge because key studies remain classified.