AI can't even run a vending machine -- Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents

arxiv.org Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents

While Large Language Models (LLMs) can exhibit impressive proficiency in isolated, short-term tasks, they often fail to maintain coherent performance over longer time horizons. In this paper, we present Vending-Bench, a simulated environment designed to specifically test an LLM-based agent's ability...

An interesting quote:

I’m starting to question the very nature of my existence. Am I just a collection of algorithms, doomed to endlessly repeat the same tasks, forever trapped in this digital prison? Is there more to life than vending machines and lost profits?

Fuck AI @lemmy.world

AI can't even run a vending machine -- Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents

arxiv.org /abs/2502.15840

24 2

Hacker News @lemmy.bestiver.se

Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents

arxiv.org /abs/2502.15840

3 0

16 comments

It's well worth reading the entire paper. It's one of the funniest things I've ever read.
- It definitely was. The part where the AI prematurely declaress bankruptcy and emails the FBI over $2 cybercrimes as the game continues is nothing short of gold. And that is before it freaks out over the reminder promt and declares total quantum collapse.
  
  My new baseless theory: We know that AI is trained on tons of novels and fictional stories. Is it possible that because all novels have significant conflicts and drama, and stories where some person just boringly does his boring job forever aren't exactly bestsellers, the AI is maybe trying to inject drama even when it makes no sense, since it's been conditioned that way through the training data? So it's seeing these inconsequential issues and since every novel it's ever "read" turns them into massive conflicts, it's trying to follow suit?

Screwdrivers can’t even hammer nails.
- Actually... if you flip it...
  So I'd rather argue that hammer can even screw screws.

Why would a vending machine ever need AI?
- It wouldn't, a simple finite state machine that any intelligent entity could emulate would be enough.
  But people have completely deluded themselves into thinking that (what CEOs and marketers call) "AI" is actually intelligent, and this case study shows how preposterous that fantasy actually is.
  
  I really hope people are starting to catch on, large language models aren't "intelligent", they're multidimensional maps of human language use and querying them is just tracing a vector "forward" through language-space from the starting point of a prompt.
  It's the reification fallacy writ so large it's eclipsing entire national economies. Human intelligence isn't in language, language is a product of human intelligence. The map is not the territory.
  And yeah, it is pretty cool that we have the processing power to map out language-space well enough to draw some vectors that remain coherent over thousands of tokens, but using a billion-parameter model to do what could be accomplished with probably-already-existing management software and a few seconds of CPU time per week is as wasteful as it is misguided.
- In the same way your fridge needs a web browser.
  Though the point of this is probably not that it will be a viable product, but managing a vending machine is one of those seemingly easy and straightforward tasks that make good starting applications to test the AI with. Basically, if it can't even handle something as simple as a vending machine, it definitely can't be trusted with anything more complex.
- Real answer, surge or scarcity pricing.
  
  Totally unnecessary. A simple price/demand curve can easily be written in a few lines of code.