Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HE
Posts
0
Comments
226
Joined
3 wk. ago

  • You do not need foresight to see how this will be abused even under the current structures.

    Or that ai does not work well. This is about making a database of evwry commu ication that authorities can access with a plausible excuse.

  • Double jepordy is forbidden in the constitution and scotus betraying it's proscription just makes them and this greasy ny judge oathbreakers.

    Two sovereigns he says, get the fuck out of government you cynical greasy hack turned oathbreaking judge.

  • I don't know about all of that, it sounds like you are rat fucking somebody that's already rat fucked. I don't have the time or energy to get to the bottom of this but I do not trust you here.

  • Exactly, one of the above commenters proclaims guilt because of a search query of that name, of which the commenter almost certainly searched that himself. I have searched all sorts of things I do not support and am even hostile to.

  • The state is collecting a database of which names are which IP addresses that they can use to identify anything anyone has said at any time in coordination with the dad Brokers they can easily buy information from. You are giving me the lawyerly pr bs well ignoring the real purpose here. We both know it. Or I hope we both know it cuz otherwise you are not very observant.

  • Anyone that is not betraying their country and country men should keep their mouths shut at work, and online in a way that could be explicitly read as against these guys. There is a way to criticize them satirically while sounding like you were agreeing with them and not communicating you are using satire. For a lot of people that would be the best option here.

  • Because the state government would collect the information about which person where signed the disclaimer about not letting kids do whatever and would have that connection between IP addresses and names and everything else they have done. This is not hard to understand.

    California is doing what Europe is doing in a sneaky way trying to rat fuck privacy.

  • First of all, the information data Brokers collect which includes Google is sold to government agencies that use it without warrant or judicial supervision.

    Second of all, this is locking down the internet. Make no mistake, it is a worldwide phenomenon, California is trying to be sneaky to fool the dumb shits that do not know what is going on. I am sure they have plenty of dumbasses and influence agents and trolls too push their point of view online as well to fool said dumb shits.

    Those of us in reality know better though.

  • Making the parents sign the disclaimer introduces a database that these politicians and lower level government officials have access to. This is a lawyerly and run around doing the same thing while still having deniability to be shitty with anybody taking issue with it, which is you. You either trust politicians, or are being dishonest here.

  • How about we get some weights of what was seized? Since before we were born law enforcement took the highest possible price anywhere and multiplied at times their bulk weight.

    Seriously, anything law enforcement says is total bullshit unless independently verified by reliable sources, which our corporate media is not.

    Just look at this Luigi Mangione, a clear Frame Up. Lying through their teeth and making grand accusations from evidence they will not show anybody else to poison the jury pool and public opinion before the trial. He is a patsy.

  • Can you paste more of the story in here under a comment or something? I think a lot of people would be interested, but maybe not to click the link if the link even worked and was not blocked.