MangioneDontMiss @ MangioneDontMiss @feddit.nl

Posts

0

Comments

11

Joined

1 day ago

We all shoot guns regularly. This kind of accuracy isn't regular.

i'm more than a bit skeptical that "the left" was responsible for this. I think its highly likely that this was a false flag attack.

i don't think i've ever seen anything from that site so blatant though. sign of the times i guess.

I have almost no doubt at this point that this was a false flag.

lol.... right. If WSJ is saying that than they have just become another puppet propaganda outlet along the same lines as newsmax and Breitbart.

ugh, these paywalls are so fucking dumb.

its stunning how different the conversations are here as opposed to reddit where everything is so damn censored and controlled.

I think its pretty unlikely that some rando did this, but who knows. The skill level to get this shot off with such accuracy though and the ability to escape without a decent picture being taken of the shooter by a security camera or something shows an immense amount of planning. I think to escape like this would require help, it would require mapping out an escape plan so you know where the cameras are. I think its very unlikely that some lone wolf would be able to pull all this off.

I have seen it mentioned in a lot of places that the shot came from the roof of the Losee building.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/11/when-and-where-charlie-kirk-was-shot-a-visual-timeline

There is also video of a man prone on the rooftop before the shooting and then someone running on the roof right after the shot.

I get the strong feeling that this shooting was done by a professional.

• 1 single shot from over two hundred yards away
• shooter escapes like a ghost, and it doesn't seem like the police have found any evidence he was even there.
• a separate person seemingly providing a distraction so the shooter can get away and the police just let him go.

Makes me wonder a few things

• was this a false flag? (seems most likely) - especially when you consider the context of trump wanting to send military into US cities and the Republicans voting against releasing the epstein docs on the same day. This shooting was an absolutely fantastic distraction and could easily be used by trump to promote his usage of military against US cities.
• was this sponsored by someone
• was this another country?
• if the shooter escaped so easily, how likely is it that he does this again somewhere else?

good riddance.