Moghul @ Moghul @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

41

Joined

2 yr. ago

I'm not gonna take responsibility and try to be your wake up call or anything, but this:

The ease at which people have been able to point to something and say “_____ is why you’re banned” kind of scares me into thinking something deeper is going on.

This thought would normally cause someone to be introspective. "What is it about oneself which is causing me to get banned?". "Something deeper is probably going on" internally.

For the record, I've only ever been banned once in my life for something I've done or said, and that was 15 years ago. There are ways to say and do things which won't get you banned. I've been on many forums and participated in many subreddits. I've even moderated before. The fact that you have a written down online code of honor/ruleset (regardless of its contents) is a red flag.

Holy shit, this is some massive turbo yikes.

It usually has a music section which can be a mixed bag in terms of sleep aid. Don't think it would work.

Old Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow, Bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow. None has ever caught him yet, for Tom, he is the master: His songs are the stronger songs, and his feet are faster.

If you're gonna brown the sausage, do it in the same pot you cook the rest of the food. Drain as much of the grease or oil as you like, and cook the food as normal. Any black or brown stuff in the pot from frying is going to be extra flavor for your food.

Then you don't fall within the 'don't need to drive but choose to' segment. I don't fully agree with the root comment of this thread, there are definitely some jobs that require a personal vehicle, and yours sounds like one of them. But for most people who are commuting twice daily, more environmentally sound options can replace their personal car.

Walk, bike, scooter, train, tram, metro, trolley, bus. Plenty of countries can swing public transportation and plenty of people don't need to drive but still choose to.

Edit: It occurs to me now this person may have been sarcastic.

I'm not the person you wrote to but I recommend reading the books and not watching the show at all.

I just skipped that and went straight for firefox with ublock. It's not as good of an experience but I thought fuck it. Youtube's going to fight these app solutions every time, but they probably can't make Mozilla remove extensions. Plus I don't have to be worried about logging my google account (even a burner) into an unknown dev's app vs mozilla who I trust more.

I personally like it when my coworkers bring their dogs. They're chill so they can hang out without being rambunctious and loud, and they help with stress. I like it when they sleep at my feet, or poke my leg for some pets. I understand why some people in the comments don't want them but honestly it greatly improves my day when they're here.

We don't have any coworkers who are allergic, but if we did, it would naturally be a dealbreaker.

This post breaks rules 1 and 3, but basically what the other comments said. It's the biggest instance so it's the biggest target. Some weeks ago there was a guy squatting community names and they got banned, after which they spammed new communities with random names, and the instance has been DDOS'd repeatedly. TBH no hard feelings towards lemmy.world, but I've switched to another one, used lemmy-migrate, and just resumed my scrolling. It's not really worth it to stay there at the moment.

I don't think about Jamie Oliver

Only if they seem suspicious to me as trying to push some kind of idea. Usually posts with leading questions such as "anyone else notice the anecdotal negative experience portrayed as norm", comments where someone blames a demographic for something, posts that are on topic but have a blatant other purpose meant to start shit (such as cat pics in c/cats held by soldiers), etc.

In too many cases, the user is really adamant about whatever they have to say, and I just end up blocking them.

Yeah that sounds much easier

She did actually agree to have that information shared with the other passengers and then still bought all the peanuts. I'm not saying she's faking her allergy or something, I'm trying to wrap my head around her train of thought here. You can also take a car, a train, a bus, all means of transportation where the transport company doesn't sell you peanuts. Yeah it's less convenient but shit man, it won't kill you.

Ideally she wouldn’t have to, peanut allergies are pretty well known and if we cared about increasing access for people not having peanuts for sale on planes is a pretty simple step

100% agree with this though

Yeah I had that thought too but if this were the case, would you take a life threatening risk that no one else on the plane has peanuts? Wouldn't you drive instead? Or take a means of public transportation where they don't regularly sell your allergen?

I guess I sort of understand, this is an enclosed space with recycled AC, but it just seems unlikely that if it was this severe she'd take a life threatening risk like this. Right?

Take it easy, man. Clearly they're wrong, and I don't know better either, would you like to contribute something that'll inform us or just get mad on the internet?

One thing in advance: Leah Williams was not forced to buy all packages of peanuts on board – on the contrary, our purser tried to offer her an alternative solution by informing all passengers sitting around her about Leah’s allergy. She agreed at first but then decided to still buy all the packages.

The airline says it is “unable to guarantee that the aircraft is free of foodstuffs that may trigger an allergic reaction, such as peanuts”, because passengers are allowed to bring their own food onboard.

I feel bad for her but I have to wonder, how does this person function on a day to day basis? If their allergy is so severe that other people eating peanuts around her would harm her, how does she leave the house? How did she navigate the airport?

Champ & chump are not the only options, and I'd say neither