Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NO
Posts
0
Comments
633
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I agree, but I think there is no around this forcing down the throat, slashing people in favour of barely functioning product. Don't get me wrong, I wish it was done the right and fair way, but realistically no one with any power wants it done in a fair way.

  • There is a lot of blind hate, because it's edgy right now to be against.

    This thing already is transformational and we can already see a glimpse where it's going. I think it's normal that we have a bunch of stupid half products right now. People just have to realise ai is under development and new advancements are coming weekly.

    Besides, what are we going to do, not develop it? Just abandon the whole technology? That's nonsense.

  • Why would I engage in this weird dance of morons? You know very well you can get all the data and statistics about crypto usage in seconds. You don't need me to show you if you want to know. But you don't. You want to argue. That's not my thing. Sorry.

  • Anybody with an Internet connection can rebute it just by googling it. So there is really no argument necessary.

    But I don't want to engage in such low level high emotion exchanges.

    Not with you either. Bye.

  • So : don't go after very specific people who also have money? Id say most people in crypto will agree that regulation is necessary and support it, on the other hand it should be obvious they will fight against blanket hate and actions that will make them lose value.

  • I work on a project where we are trying to analyse financial data. We use Claude and llama and they are really good. We needed a few months to achieve 87% reliability.

    For our application that's probably almost enough. For an application that needs 100% all the time, every time, that quite a lot away.

  • So all your points are “nu-uh”.

    You know very well that's not true as you have contradicted yourself a few times already.

    Show me a single product that is even close to being worth the investment.

    Are we talking about money now? I thought we were talking about how its all a scam that's harming humanity.

    Where?

    Coding, writing, marketing, graphic design, ....

    Writing boilerplate articles without content for dying news outlets?

    Cant you see stuff you are saying? Thats really emotional stuff, its clouding your rationale.

    And where are all those great graphic design products? You mean those cool images of Trump riding a laser velociraptor?

    Yes, that as well. But mainly small tasks that used to be menial and now they are practically gone. Ideas, retouching, photo manipulations,....

    Yes. Also, Metaverse, blockchain, etc. Ever heard of the dotcom bubble? Same pattern.

    Thats pretty naive. Dotcom bubble has nothing to do with it. A completely different thing.

    Hard doubt. Because the number one virtue of a scientist is to know the limitations of their subject. So either you’re not actually a researcher, or a really bad one.

    I don't care. Plus I already said I'm not a researcher. I work at a company that does ai research.

    You are so emotionally charged. I don't know if its only your hate of AI, or if you want to somehow win over me in this conversation. Its pointless. AI already helps a lot of people in an incredible amount of ways. Some of them were mentioned in the comments. Its not serious to call them scams and I don't know what else you said. Its not serious. I think its better to end this exchange. I must say I like talking to people with different views, but it has to be in good faith and I don't see that here with all the generalizations.