I just use a value ranking system and rapidly sort variables until I reach the highest possible value.
Women>Men
Pop colors > blending (red is greater than brown, etc.)
Interesting features > bland (So a dude with a scar registers higher than a dude without)
Anomalies > expecteds (a top hat is more interesting than a ball cap)
There's probably some other minor variations that account for my choices. Thinking about it, the preference for women may be due to them having more eye-catching variables than men in most cases, especially with regards to color and accessories.
Voat was batshit crazy, but some of the things done there were done well. I really liked that the 'big subs' were considered voat run, so the moderators didn't get to make their own little kingdoms of folly in the most popular areas. The commitment to free speech was great. It just went down so hard because the first people who went to it were the type to scrawl on the walls of their house in pastel crayon and neon spray paint.
What's amusing to me is that one of the stated reasons the religious nut jobs were persecuted was for their anti-war beliefs. Somehow that script got flipped.
Now that you say that, it's really an odd, surreal experience. Were my fellow children unique, and just did not grow up, and made a blend of their childhood and what should be adult pursuits, or were people in the past just as fucked up, but all they had to make porn of was Charles Dickens and Dante and such?
Very few, if we've been paying attention. Which protests/riots had more cops willing to shoot at those involved? The heavily armed 'marches' that we've seen, or the large crowds of unarmed individuals? Sure, some of that may have been because of bias from the police, but I guarantee most of it was because they were afraid of starting a shooting when there was the possibility of being shot back at.
Same here, but their true address is still held somewhere. It's only the displayed address on a driver's license that shows the police station/court. Listing it as their address for voting purposes probably is probably murky, and not explicitly allowed or explicitly illegal.
I'm really curious (as I'm not living there) what the difference is. Is it just their religious tendencies? Or is it their feelings towards the nebulous "other" that defines them?
Yeah, one of the big countermeasures being the people who live on board, as in, the crew. I hope they can sleep at night knowing they killed a working class schmuck. Fire, or these more outlandish ideas of explosives and scuba shit, will almost certainly get the crew members if it's enough to actually sink a yacht like this.
Yes! That fucking Welcome Home had us all thinking it would be a hardcore horror action. It wasn't bad, but damn, yeah, disappointed is the right word.
I just use a value ranking system and rapidly sort variables until I reach the highest possible value.
Women>Men
Pop colors > blending (red is greater than brown, etc.)
Interesting features > bland (So a dude with a scar registers higher than a dude without)
Anomalies > expecteds (a top hat is more interesting than a ball cap)
There's probably some other minor variations that account for my choices. Thinking about it, the preference for women may be due to them having more eye-catching variables than men in most cases, especially with regards to color and accessories.