SharkPlushy @ SharkPlushy @lemmy.world

I love Hatsune Miku!!

---

Read more

Posts

2

Comments

29

Joined

1 mo. ago

I'm not saying we should give up I was giving a more realistic answer.

Not every country will agree and some might be interested in having companies like OpenAI moving to their country and investing in the country.

There is 2 type of AI content generating users at least from what I understand.

1. Normal people who makes stupid memes, emojis and whatever else. They don't care if their AI generated emoji has a watermark since these pictures are used in 1 on 1 chat or group chats with few people.
2. People who profit off this and are the cause of most of the slop seen on front pages. These people use AI to either data harvest for profit or make content for profit and as long as it makes them money they'll jump though as many hoops as they need to.

The people who create AI generated content for profit are the biggest problem they have AI working 24/7 spitting out crap for their AI generated TikTok page and usually generate more than an average user might over the course of months.

There is of course more than just that example.

Books Music Ads Comments Games Code

These are the examples I can think of the top of my head.

Ok let's say the United States passes a law where AI content needs to be water marked.

That won't stop an AI company from a different country hosting their servers in a different country.

A water mark might be easily removed for the most part also.

That also means human moderators need to step in and check if let's say a song is AI.

You can make the audio file of the song state "This is AI music" or something but anyone can edit that out.

In theory in could work but in practice it could make things worse.

AI generates water marked image > Different AI removes it is a basic example.

That'll use more energy than just having the first AI generate non water marked image.

I would take laws and regulation over nothing any day, but marking content as "AI" doesn't solve the bigger problems.

Thanks for this I didn't know these existed.

AI content doesn't need to exist at all the few benefits don't outweigh all the negatives.

Even if people didn't abuse it and used it for it's intended purpose AI is stupid.

These companies include "ai isn't accurate" or something along the lines of that on their website.

But if it isn't accurate whats the point of anyone using it since after it gives me false information I'll go Google the answer or ask for an answer on a forum?

If it's not accurate whats the point of it being at the top of my search result??

AI doesn't need to be there at all if I have to look for the answer to my question elsewhere.

So people use a bunch of electricity just for a non accurate answer then use more electricity to look up the answer elsewhere.

Cutie