Susaga @ Susaga @ttrpg.network

Posts

24

Comments

290

Joined

2 yr. ago

Holy fuck, that article is elitist. Half of the sections seem pointlessly mean, like they're trying to dunk on them to win popularity points. One of them is just insulting Chad Kroeger for marrying Avril Lavigne, as if a 10+ year marriage is a bad thing. Some valid points buried in there, but the credibility is lost.

Well, my opinion is that, since you defend violent public executions but condemn ridicule of yourself, your respect is worthless. And my opinion is that, since you wrote a lengthy condemnation of the entire website because people ridiculed you one time, you are acting very much like a butthurt individual would.

I know that's just my opinion, but I also gave reasons.

So, that's a yes, then. You seem to think that defending public execution gives you a higher moral standing than someone calling you names.

So... You can accept people publically executing people, but people calling you names is a step too far? Am I understanding that right?

Huh. Fair enough. Still doesn't explain the lemmy.world one, but they might have had one deleted and deleted the other one as a response.

That message is only in lemmy.ml, but the same post was made in lemmy.world and there's no message like that at all. It's possible one was deleted and the other was removed, but it's also possible that that is a different post entirely. You'd need to ask the poster.

You'd have to ask that guy, I suppose. He posted it to two different communities, and neither community's modlog show that post being deleted by a mod, so they definitely removed it themself.

Preteen me was bad at Japanese.

The correct plural is whatever word you say that people understand as meaning more than one octopus. That's how language works.

I would actually recommend !anime@ani.social instead. The admins of lemmy.ml are weirdly hostile towards anime, but ani.social is an anime-specific instance.

"What are the most vile things you would do if there were no consequences?" That's all you need. Everything else didn't need to be there, and still doesn't.

You are actively making this post terrible.

You already edited three times, once to complain about people not liking the question. You have the time to respond to me, you have the time to fix your mistake. The fact you aren't makes everything you're doing intentional.

You had a short question! The only reason it didn't fit is you wanted to add too much context ahead of time and MADE it not fit. The context could have come after.

Ironic that you say to use real words, yet you use slang initialisms frequently. But it's fine, because those are things that you understand. It's only a problem if people younger than you say stuff that you personally don't understand yet, right?

There are dice goblins who get as many as possible and dice elves who have a few good dice they treasure.

I have a slight feeling you're making it more complicated than it needs to be... Like, how are you in a building with security cameras AND illusions? Surely the illusions make it harder for the cameras to do their job. And surely, since you're in a building, the giant worms can't get close enough to affect anything. Plus, the number of banshees would be unchanged since 10 feet ago, as would the scry spell.

It's actually kind of astonishing that what villains try to do for an entire campaign is done as collateral damage by you using a first level spell slot, and it only heals 6 hitpoints. Meanwhile, Sad Frank drinks two potions and does the same, but without billions of deaths. Score one for Sad Frank.

I disagree with that interpretation. Evil shouldn't be going out of your way to cause harm, it should be willingly causing harm to get your way. The harm is the method, not the goal.

Like, a good person driving down the road will swerve and crash their car to avoid hitting a dog. A neutral person would stop the car and see if they can move the dog, or at least drive around it. An evil person wouldn't even slow down. Why should they have to be a minute late because some idiot dog decided to stand in the wrong place?

Meanwhile, if the evil person swerved and crashed their car to hit a dog who wasn't even on the road, their car would be wrecked and their journey would be totally ruined. They'd be just as foolish as the good person. If you're going to have your actions bound by the same restrictive moral guidelines as good people in a new coat of paint, you might as well be good.

I prefer to think of good vs evil as altrusim vs egoism. LG is "the laws should protect everyone" and LE is "the laws should protect me". CG is "everyone should be free to live as they please" and CE is "I should be free to live as I please". Acting in pure self-interest with no regard for ideals would be CE, or maybe NE depending on how it's done.

If the image is even slightly convincing, it's essentially just defamation with digital impersonation thrown in. Yeah, that might catch photoshop in its net, but you'd need to be a DAMN good artist to get caught in it as well.