Socialist Mormon Satanist @ UniversalMonk @lemmy.world

Mormon Satanist. Transracial Socialist Workers Party Kopimist Monk. Debt-fr

---

查看更多

帖子

494

评论

3,341

加入于

1 yr. ago

管理

---

It's not sarcasm. I have no reason to dislike you.

I'm appreciative of your passion about political news, even though your opinions are different than mine.

I totally respect your right to have your opinions. Thank you! :)

Right? Doesn't he eat mcd's every single day or something?

No aspirations. I just post what I find interesting. Thank you! :)

Well, it seems like that there are plenty of people not wanting to vote for her or Trump. I'm one of them.

This is a public forum. You shared your thoughts. I shared mine. Thanks, friend! :)

"Comrade." I actually like using that word! Ever since I read speeches by Eugene V. Debs when I was in high school.

Interesting. From article:

Minutes after Donald Trump delivered his standard warnings about drug dealers and criminals illegally crossing the border during a Saturday campaign event, the former president heard from someone who was once in the country illegally but now plans to vote for him.

Yep, that's actually a fairly accurate way of looking at it.

Except the difference is that they produce the pieces. I don't.

In fact, I don't even literally post "the article," I just post a link to the article. It's up to the reader to decide if they want to read it or not.

And of course like I mentioned before, I strongly believe in and support people's right to vote for who they want to.

Thank you!

Me too! And I'm glad you'll be doing that. Always good to see more articles. Awesome! Thank you!! :)

Good thing I don't write the articles then, right? Can you imagine how error-prone they'd be?! lol

And hey, at least now you know I'm not a bot. Thank you! :)

Yep!! Bingo!!

Well, the dem part just spent money on an ad campaign, directed towards her. They see her as a threat, even if you don't.

Well if my posts don't matter to people here, then you have no reason to be upset by them. Thank you!

What I said was accurate. Thanks!

I don't write the articles, I just post articles I find interesting. I believe people should vote for who they want to vote for. I'm not influencing anyone's vote. The articles I post are readily available on news sites.

Meh, I don't write them. And they don't seem poorly written to me. Thanks! :)

Oh, so your weren't referring to me or talking about me in the comments, right!? Yay!

I don't want to assume who you are referring to, but for me personally, I don't think it'll slow anyone down. Why would it? Posting is a simple cut-and-paste of web addy and article title. Takes exactly the same time regardless of source: just a few seconds.

So it's just as easy to post from original sources, but now not all people on Lemmy will be able to read the article because some sites paywall.

I have lots of news subscriptions (I love political news), so not an issue for me personally, but I can see how it may frustrate some readers. But it doesn't bother the person posting at all, because they've already read the article.

I think the new rule is perfectly fine though, and I'm happy for anything that will remove some of the criticisms I see regarding false accusations of trying to hide sources.

So I think you had a great idea and I'm happy they implemented it! Thank you! :)

Lemmy is a small, but growing community that needs more content to compete with Reddit. Prolific posters are actually something to celebrate for helping the community grow. In my personal opinion.

I actually wish there were more prolific posters and more posters in general.

And of course, we can always block posters if we don't want to view their content. :)