Farid @ abfarid @startrek.website

Posts

1

Comments

1,276

Joined

2 yr. ago

Loose seal! Loose seal!

Lemmy is not internet. It has been towed outside the environment.

I mean, that requirement is kind of implied.

Idk why, but I only got a notification about this today, even though the comment is 5d old.
Anyway, you're right, I meant "closed" in a sense of "they eat each other's poo". It's also possible the difference in calories is made up some extra stuff, with like photosynthesis or whatever.

Only if you're "good looking".

Spicy pillows do be like that.

A bunch of blåhajs are being piled on a bed, accompanied by Half Life 2 noises for comedic effect.

Isn't it a toupee? Which keeps flying off.
Besides, being bald is more manly.

Mine's screen popped out due to the battery swelling :(

That's one expensive joke...

It's not even subtle, House literally lives at 221B Baker Street.

Yep, that's them. Had a long-ass thread with them where they wouldn't engage with any of my arguments about why Ukrainians aren't Nazis and instead tried to attack me directly. But can't tell for sure if they are a tankie, vatnik, or just a troll.

That's a Chevrolet, in case you were serious.

How are they paying their electricity bill?

Thank you very much for your response (and the invitation)! Although I'm still left wondering about the purpose of listing the subjective case. Your approach makes more sense, "you can use these" and list several options. But why do people list, for example "she/her"? Everybody knows what the subjective case of "she" is.

Since it's ok to ask (I hope), and I guess this is more of a general question rather than personal, but does the order of listed pronouns matter? Is it, like, in order of preference? Mostly I see the second pronoun to just be the objective case form of the first, but yours isn't. Why do people even list the objective case when it matches the subjective case?

Nice!
Incidentally, that logo color matches perfectly with the color theme (Arc Boost) I've been using for the website:

I wasn't claiming a personal stake, I was presenting you with the source of my information and proof of personal and intimate familiarity with the situation. Stop attempting to look for loopholes, there aren't any, because unlike you I'm being completely honest and truthful.

There's plenty of valid criticism towards Ukrainian government, which I have explicitly agreed to. Them being a Nazi, however is a false claim at best and deliberate propaganda at worst. If somebody is challenging your false claim, and showing that you're wrong, it doesn't mean that they are taking it personally. But of course you're gonna stick to your tactic of ignoring my arguments, and in addition now throw in an ad hominem attack. Ukraine is not even "my country", I'm not a citizen and can't vote in elections, so I can't even "take it personally".

And to answer your question, I would easily admit that the government is Nazi, if I saw at least 1 solid point proving that fact. So since I haven't observed, and you failed to provide any, I'll have to insist that your claim is blatantly false.

Also yes, you got me, I'm a middle-eastern-looking, brown haired, dark-skinned Nazi supporter. (/s for absolute clarity)
Every shot you take is a miss.