cerebralhawks @ cerebralhawks @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

0

Comments

63

Joined

5 days ago

I'm using Voyager. I don't really care if it doesn't get the Liquid Ass interface. When I was still on Reddit, I was testing an app (Lander) that used it. It looked so bad on iOS 18, but on the 26 beta, it looked a little better. Very crash happy though.

(I like Liquid Glass, but I'm not gonna use that name. I say "Liquid Ass" with nothing but love. It looks great to me!)

Anyway, I like how it looks. Like how Apollo used to.

Anyone who uses something different, why? What's it got over Voyager? Android and iOS answers valid — I have an iPhone 16 Pro Max, and a Galaxy S10. The -E version with only two cameras and the side mounted fingerprint reader/track pad. Currently rocking Voyager on both. But always open to change!

Voyager is free but it has tips, so there are IAPs for that.

I think it's based on Apollo source?

What's cool is it's also on Android (I have one of each). Apollo was never on Android. And it's neat, being on Android and you open Voyager and you're using an iOS-looking app in Android. It's not the first. I also have Apple Music on both of them, and yeah, that's iOS design language through and through. Some Google apps are Android-themed on iOS, and that's fine... for the people who use them. I really don't, except Gmail.

Yeah, I don't know why this is a debate. LGBTQ+ ally my whole life, though I'm cis/straight myself.

I almost get it. Like the fear that you hook up with a girl and she has boy parts. It's not really reasonable but it's a common male fear, I guess. Like she's gonna be so convincingly female, so perfectly female presenting but she hasn't had the bottom surgery. I think that's kind of a fantasy, because pass as the sex a trans person feels isn't as easy as cisgendered people think it is. I have trans (MTF) friends, and they do not pass well. Oh, I fully accept that they are women; what I don't do is assume I'm entitled to every female body, or for the female bodies I have access to, to fit into my potentially narrow view (it's not narrow, but if it were) of what makes a woman attractive. At the end of the day, she's a person and her body is what it is, take her — as a complete person — or don't, but don't waste her time and definitely don't think you can shame her for it. And it absolutely don't mean she's any less a woman. That, I do feel strongly about.

Also, I've known a couple tomboys, girls I grew up around who weren't conventionally pretty, who liked to play and fight with the boys (and they'd kick your ass, too), and the older adults said "oh yeah that's a baby butch right there" and later, when trans people became more visible to us (I'd say late 90s early 00s), the assumption that she's gonna transition. Going on like 30 years later, they're still girls and they're still straight (and the one I'm thinking of, definitely wears the pants in the relationship, her guys tend to be kinda meek) but that doesn't mean she's gay or trans. Oh, plenty of LGBTQ+ in the family, but you can't say because a girl doesn't like pink and doesn't like dresses that she's lesbian or trans. It doesn't work that way. But as her peer, as her playmate, and often as one whose ass she'd kick, I didn't care. I love her for the person she is, not for the box society puts her in, or checks for her. And if she did bring home a girlfriend, or if she did tell me she never felt like a girl and was going to transition... my sister (not really but like a sister to me) would be my brother or whatever and that would be okay with me, whatever the case, and I'd have their back regardless.

Yeah but look at flat-earthers, how do you justify that?

I remember when the flat-earther movement was new, there were some people in it who claimed to be smart. They said they don't really believe it, they just like to be sceptical... and contrarian. Basically they like to argue, for the sake of making people question what they've been taught and what they don't know from their own personal observations. Like "are you really any better than us because you trust people who are more trustworthy?" I can almost see the point. But yes, that's kind of how it works... I don't need to be smart about some broad or niche category if people certified and well read on that thing who are accredited by reputable institutions tell me what it is and around the world, they agree, in different languages, it's not a conspiracy. But I guess some healthy scepticism is good.

Now, these alt-right guys? Yeah, I don't get it. They aren't fulfilling promises on anything but making things harder for minorities. They are doing what they said there. You knew he was going to go after brown-skinned people and the gays, so no surprise there. Tearing down institutions, this hyper militant shit, yeah maybe he didn't campaign on that but I feel like, if you didn't go out and vote against him last November, you kinda did cosign on all this.

Wouldn't "GPT it" be easier/more likely to say?

I generally don't use these, but Copilot (in Windows) uses one of them (I'm not sure which) and I've thrown a few questions at it when I'm bored. Nothing that matters. We have Windows 11 machines at work. I find AI amusing but I don't take it seriously, and I don't use it at home or on my mobile. It's really not for me.

I don't like Grok but they have a good name. I mean I don't "like" any of them, but I like that one less because of its... the stuff it's said. Mostly because of who's been training it. But "Grok it" sounds better than Chat/GPT it and sounds almost as good as "Google it."

I'd have to ask how old this system is. Ours was black, made by Kenwood, and had a wooden cabinet. Tinted glass door. Tape player was a dual front loader. That looks like a CD cartridge loader. We had that too. Our cartridges held six discs and they swiveled out.

Wasn't mine, it was my mother's, and she still has it. It still works. The doors on the tape deck have snapped off (we were rough with them) but you can still snap tapes into it and they play.

I remember when my mother got it. She'd just gotten divorced, had a bit of money, walked into a Circuit City (this woulda been like 1989?) and asked for the best stereo they had. And I think either she or I asked about Sony, because I remember the guy saying Sony was for people who want people to think they have an expensive stereo. Kenwood was for people who wanted a good stereo. I don't know how true it was. Maybe he just wanted to make a commission. I think she paid a couple grand for it. I don't recall. I didn't pay for it. I bought my Super NES from that same Circuit City though, and I paid for that out of my allowance. $150. I didn't bring the tax though. My mother did cover the tax. But anyway.

But while it wasn't mine, I was the one who put it together, because back then you didn't have Geek Squad (which is Best Buy, but you get the idea). I think they might have had "professional home installation" but that has never been cheap or affordable. Plus, my mother's oldest son (me) was a computer guy. She figured, if he could put together a computer (that is, connect a monitor, keyboard, and mouse to a computer and turn it on — I wouldn't start building them for another 15 years — I could assemble a stereo. Which just meant stacking them on the shelves, and connecting them via the wires in the back. Two wires — one red, one white — connected to each component and plugged into the... switcher? Whatever it was called. Pretty easy. Did it again when we moved. And then again when it came from the garage, which was like a family room, to the living room when we turned the garage into a granny unit for family who would move in. And then, when I did that, I was able to connect the TV to it, which greatly improved our sound.

Oh yeah, OP doesn't show the speakers. Did that Sony kit include them? I'm sure it must have. My mother's Kenwood came with speakers as tall as the cabinets! Two of them. The speakers only lasted maybe 20, 30 years though? My brother, then grown, found her better, more modern speakers to hook up to it.

There’s an easy solution to this. I pay for Apple Music because I get access to pretty much all the music I want. I can sideload what they don’t have, which isn’t much. They have better audio quality, and aren’t stiffing artists to pay some right wing nutjob science denier like the other streaming platform of note. I pay because I love music and want to support what I love. Why isn’t there a similar service for TV and movies? That’s the solution. Let us pay for what we love and make it easy. Apple figured it out with music. Valve figured it out with games.

I think they don’t want to solve the problem. I think they want to solve a different problem. I think they’re making this a problem so they can push legislation to protect their profits.

Facts

Sorry about the late reply. I'm new to Lemmy, and looking for AC/ACNH communities to join, and share with.

I've used TIs (Treasure Islands) from these people, and if you have Amazon Prime, you can also donate a Twitch sub. Prime gives you one a month at no extra fee, but you do need to have Prime. You can get a trial if you want to use the TIs for a month for free.

People leaving silently (via the minus button) is something I think a couple people do intentionally. They will wait until someone joins an island. Sometimes they follow you around, grabbing the stuff you're interested in. Sometimes they just hang back a bit. After you get a bunch of stuff, sometimes when you go to leave, they quietly leave so you lose all progress. Unfortunately the people who run the TIs really don't care all that much. You can report them (you can see who they are and keep tabs on them, so if they request a Dodo code, you can finish up and leave before they get their Dodo code put in) but it won't do much good. I think it's a game to them, like hunting. I bet they figure if fewer people use the TIs, it's fewer load times for those who are willing to deal with the occasional griefer.

Also, helps if you go during non-peak hours. TIs typically run 24/7.

Disco Elysium is the kind of game I'd love to sit down with the developers/producers and try to play it, and ask them questions about it.

I own it on Steam, but I can't remember if I bought it because it was on Mac, or if I bought it before I switched. Either way, I've tried to start it a few times and I just don't get anywhere. It's the kind of game I should like, but I don't have the patience to learn it.

Some people say you can use a de-Googled Chromium browser to enjoy the fruits of Chrome without supporting Google's ad business. I say just use Firefox.

By the same token, when some people say to buy an Android phone and deal with CFW, I say just get an iPhone.

I mean either way, Google gets your money and you contribute to Google's market share by buying one. Not using Google Play Services as an individual does not hurt them nearly as much as their efforts to keep you from doing so implies it does.

Of course, switching phones can be costly, but if you're in the market for a new one, I would say if you're going to pay roughly the same price, let it be the more private one, albeit the one that is further from open source. I mean it runs iOS, which is a stripped down version of macOS, which is UNIX certified, but you can't run a few apps that Apple doesn't approve of. Fortnite is back and emulators are back though, so a lot of bases are covered.

That said... the keyboard sucks. Sometimes if I'm gonna be typing (e.g. using Lemmy), I'll actually turn on my old Galaxy S10, just to use Gboard (which is on iOS but sucks there). I like my 16PM for a lot of things, but typing isn't one of them.

So yes. You can stop rewarding Google's bad behavior by not buying their phones. Draw a hard line between your personal data and their servers. But in doing so, consider getting in bed with a different monster rather than "the devil you know." It's not an easy decision. And, as a guy who's been mainly on iPhone for almost 10 years... I kinda want a Pixel. Maybe not the newest one, but I mean, I'm using a 6-year-old Galaxy phone and it's fine. I like both platforms. Both have their strengths. But I personally trust Apple more than Google. To each their own though.

I don't think I ever had a Discman until I bought myself the $150 Philips model that also played MP3 CDs. It was a fine CD player with good anti-skip, but you "only" had 80 minutes per disc.

With MP3 CDs, you could have several albums up there and the quality seemed to be about the same. The organisation was not so great and it was hit or miss what album number your albums would be (and I think it could change from day to day, so it wasn't like you could Sharpie it on the disc), but the anti-skip became nearly perfect as most of the song would be played from the buffer. I think (but I'm not sure) that made it spin less and thus, saved battery life. Makes sense anyway.

Dexter technically hasn't ended, unless you mean the series Dexter.

There have been two spinoffs, and the second one hasn't ended yet. So for the people who say Dexter should have died/been exposed/caught/shamed at the end... well... it hasn't ended yet.

Also, the books are wilder. In the last one I read, the little boy and girl of Rita's were getting into killing. The little girl says "I don't kill because I'm a girl, so I'm just the lookout for my brother." The brother kills animals, the girl watches out, distracts anyone who might come around, basically runs interference for him. IIRC they're twins and maybe the book tried the whole "psychic twin connection" stuff? It's been a while. The book just gave creepier vibes than the previous ones and I quit there.

The problem with the LOST ending was, it wasn't planned. They wrote themselves into a corner.

I'm good with the ending, too. I'm also good with people roasting them for it. And I'm also good with situations like in FROM where Harold Perrineau said he wouldn't work with them (same people) if they didn't have the ending pre-planned in advance. They even poke fun at the LOST ending in one of the early episodes, implying it won't go that way.

Not a truck driver, but an American who has seen this question answered, and it applies to lorries, too (we call them box trucks, like moving trucks, here — I don't know if you call a full tractor-trailer a lorry).

It's absolutely to reduce drag, and when they travel in a convoy, they typically do it with all members knowing full well what they're doing, and they take turns leading (as that one gets the wind resistance the others avoid). So yes, they're saving money on petrol (gas), they're saving the environment, they're saving time... it's just annoying if you want to get over past them. They should let you through but it's annoying you have to ask (with your signal). Typically our big trucks tend to do their thing and stay out of peoples' way, but sometimes they wanna act like they own the road (and they're unfairly maligned in thriller films).

Wow. I cannot see Adam Scott as David Fisher. I could see him as Nate Fisher, though.

People listen to the audiobook of Stephen King's Pet Sematary and think they're listening to Dexter narrate it (it's narrated by Michael C. Hall). No, that's David Fisher narrating it. But everyone knows Hall as Dexter Morgan, and that's fine.

Six Feet Under is still legendary and still relevant, and it still has the best ending on television, bar absolutely none. I was borderline pissed off when Luther tried to use that song ("Breathe Me," by Sia) near the end of the first series. I did have to look up to see which show did it first — it was absolutely 6FU.

I knew they were from the 80s. I did not think they came out before '88-'89 though.

I remember when the CD was relatively new. And they were still writing the standards for it. Red Book is the standard for CDs. Philips, Sony, and the others went to the record companies and they negotiated quality vs storage amounts. The quality the music industry demanded would have allowed about 8 minutes per disc. The compromise got that up to 80 minutes. Now, CDs have pretty good quality audio. For a while we said "CD quality audio" and that meant something, largely in gaming, but also in streaming later to differentiate from lossy audio (that, to most of us, sounded the same). Later we'd surpass "CD quality audio" (e.g. Dolby Atmos on Apple Music... though, not everyone agrees spatial audio is an improvement) but for a decade or two, it meant something.

Anyway, my first CDs were "Bat Out of Hell II: Back Into Hell" by Meat Loaf, and yes, I understand what he won't do for love. I don't know why this was ever questioned. Certainly not by anyone who listened to the song. He said he wouldn't move on after she died. Because the fictional version of him talking was this immortal type, like a benign vampire or something. She made him promise that when she died, he'd move on and find someone else. That was where he drew the line. It's literally right there in the lyrics and it isn't hard to understand. The others were the Bodyguard soundtrack (so, mostly Whitney Houston), and "No More Tears" by Ozzy Osbourne. So, early 1990s. CDs had been out for a while, but I was happy with tapes for some years before I got a CD player. And, fun fact, I at least had the Meat Loaf CD for a while before I got my first CD player. I just kept it in a drawer until I could play it.

I just replaced my dying Windows machines (a laptop and later, a desktop) with Macs. Still closed source, but they're UNIX certified. I know FOSS folks love to hate on macOS, but even being smart enough to use Linux, and having used it off and on for 20-25 years, I just didn't want to. I did get away from Microsoft stuff, at least at home, except for Xbox. That was my wife's choice and we have a bunch of games for it. I'm more of a PlayStation guy, but I kinda got outvoted on that one. These days I mostly just game on the Switch anyway. And the cool thing about new Macs? They can basically run Switch games, with a bit of help (but same-ish architecture). And a lot of games going to Switch(/2) can also go to Mac (e.g. Cyberpunk).

It's a great time to get away from Microsoft. Their browser hasn't been good enough in decades. Their office suite is probably their biggest strength, followed by Xbox. Their cloud would be third, I'd say — OneDrive is underrated. I use iWork on my Macs and it's fine. And it can read/write the docx formats. For cloud I guess iCloud is fine on the Mac side, I just wish the pricing were more competitive. Don't really have a good answer for cloud. And for gaming... if you were starting from zero, I'd say look at the Steam Deck, Steam sales are unbeatable, the thing runs Linux, it emulates PC games pretty well (there's a whole certification thing), and you can do GeForce Now as well if you're near their CDN. Microsoft is arguably the easiest of the big three (vs Apple and Google) to drop.

I don't even need to know why people are going against Microsoft all of a sudden. I have my reasons. I don't hate them, and I would have stuck with Office + OneDrive (MS 365) if they didn't double the price to add AI to Office with no way to stick with the old product. They were getting $60 a year from me, now they're not getting anything.

I would say there is a case to argue it can be a delusion. I would say you don't have the authority to determine to what extent someone enjoys or relates to this delusion.

I saw a conversation on another site and I didn't reply the way I wanted because it would have been insensitive. But that point of view has greater context here. People were talking about the AIDS epidemic of the 1980s and 1990s. I don't know anyone who died from AIDS, or really felt connected to any celebrities who had it. However (especially since you bring up anime in the OP), there is an anime that is generally disliked for a few reasons, some of them valid. Since I am introducing it in this context, I cannot say what the anime is, because the "AIDS angle" is a huge spoiler, and I really don't do spoilers. But it introduces this character near the end of the second season, and this character is all kinds of awesome and inspirational. You find out that what they're doing is due to their time being short... due to AIDS. Or, if we're going off the book those episodes are based on (light novel, not manga), it's actually AIDS and cancer because, like, eff this character in particular, I guess. I don't think I have to tell you how this arc ends. I will say if it were its own thing, if it were adapted separately from that anime with all the baggage, it would stand as one of the great drama series out there, it would have a lot more fans and attention on it.

So now we circle back to the OP's question. If happiness coming from anime (or the other media) is invalid, what about sadness from anime? What if it's an anime character with purple hair who really makes you care about a real-life social issue that doesn't affect anyone you know? Does that make it any less real?

It's not up to me to decide for you. I personally believe those feelings are valid. How you feel, I suppose, depends on factors that matter to you. For example, you might personally know someone who died from AIDS, and you're like "well screw that fictional character, because that disease claimed millions of lives and I'm more affected." But I would argue the story brings awareness. I would not argue that such a person is wrong for feeling that way, though.

If you know what anime I'm talking about, I'd ask that you follow my lead on the spoiler thing and not mention it. But I'm no one's boss here.