Great chance to learn something new! Sweden has a law forbidding military use against civilians.
I just assumed that at least the losers of the second world war would have laws severely prohibiting military uses.
Anyway, in states with rule of law it's not just 'paper'. Change or abolish laws yes, ignoring them no. And the purpose of the military can be debated. I'd say their purpose is to uphold the constitution and protect both citizens and state.
Sure, but that wasn't what the first commenter said. Moving away would lessen the force visavi standing still. Now if it's better to move in or away is another question.
Do you want me to provide sources telling you that people starved, that the peasants rose up and executed their king in addition to a lot of other people during the french revolution?
What the hell is this? History revisionism regarding the french revolution, what is your goal here? Are you Louis XVI ghost?
The French revolution was absolutely a class war with the under class literally overthrowing the ruling class and executing them with a guillotine, which makes your meme wrong. No matter how you try to spin the French revolution this stands.
Well that was me. I believe most people would associate the French revolution with "eat cake" and blood flowing on the streets of Paris. So yeah, a violent uprising by hungry peasants.
Ok, so if you run into someone standing still, that will hurt a lot, right?
Now, if you run into someone else also running who is just a bit slower than you, that doesn't hurt as much.
It's the same reason boxers "roll with the punch". If a strike comes to the face they will move their head to negate/lessen the impact
So if an object in motion with the force of 1 newton hits an object at rest that's 1 newton of force applied, yes?
Now if the object instead hits an object also in motion with 0.5 newton, will the first object hit it with 1 or 0.5 newton?
Great chance to learn something new! Sweden has a law forbidding military use against civilians.
I just assumed that at least the losers of the second world war would have laws severely prohibiting military uses.
Anyway, in states with rule of law it's not just 'paper'. Change or abolish laws yes, ignoring them no. And the purpose of the military can be debated. I'd say their purpose is to uphold the constitution and protect both citizens and state.