humanoidchaos @ humanoidchaos @lemmy.cif.su

Posts

4

Comments

211

Joined

2 wk. ago

Wikipedia already doesn't allow that, so your question is pointless.

It's part of liberals trying to control what other people think by controlling what they say and read.

The reason why news outlets aren't allowed to say "immigrant" anymore is because college-educated liberals don't want people who oppose immigration to have words to support their case.

I say this as someone who loves immigration. The policing of language by the left does more harm than good and only serves to feed the egos of slacktivists, not actually change the world in any meaningful way.

Yeah, no.

It's still censorship even if the person in question wants it to be censored.

People shouldn't get to dictate whether or not wikipedia articles are made of them.

That doesn't make it ok.

I don't see it affecting me too much, but I feel bad for the people it will affect.

None at all. Mods are happy for the opportunity to dictate what other people get to say.

It's not work for them.

You should use Friendica as a replacement for facebook.

I don't really see a point in something like Instagram, considering you can just share pictures on facebook already, but Pixelfed is the logical replacement for it.

Make it sexy.

If we had an easier time getting laid fighting back instead of going along, then that's what people would start doing.

Youtube is actual trash and we have modern designers and businessmen to blame.

The lack of western media reporting on the state of Ukraine leads me to believe they will make concessions to end the war soon.

Part of how propaganda works is not reporting on things that make 'your side' look bad. In other words, "no news is bad news."

Say it.

Democrat politicians are just representing their base.

Most democrats don't want the disparity in wealth to shrink because they would have less money relative to their peers. It's why they voted against Bernie, twice.

As soon as neo-liberals' wealth is threatened, they get right in bed with conservatives.

Neither party represents workers, which is why it's stupid for millions of workers to get up in arms defending them. It's why the average person is a useful idiot.

Fucking awful candidate.

I feel bad for the Israelis that have to deal with the backlash 1000 years from now.

Israel should honestly be treated like Antarctica at this point, only with more international security.

Do the engineers get to see a proportional return on this?

I used to have respect for those people, but now I just see them as suckers aiding the enemy.

Not bias, but I was surprised to find out how Wikipedia is censoring information surrounding ChrisChan.

All of the articles mentioning him in English just say he's an internet personality, and his English Wikipedia page has been removed.

That kind of censorship doesn't sit will with me. What else are they keeping from us?

That's unfortunately a dealbreaker for me. I have a free phone from some company I've never heard of and I don't plan on buying a new one. Hopefully we will see more progress on mobile operating systems in the coming years.

Quality- down

Quantity- down

Profits- UP UP UP

Useful idiots- PROUD PROUD PROUD

I wish we lived in a society where we made fun of idiots for getting ripped off. There's just so many of them though that it's seen as normal and we're the weird ones if we don't go along with it.

The elitism surrounding ground beef, cheese, beans, and tortillas is always amusing.

I bet you also think less or more of people based on how they like their steak.

Sure bud.