actively investing in shell and actively investing in crypto is unethical and it's not wrong to point it out, and neither is this moral panic; if you don't want to be subjected to ethical assessment, don't brag about potentially unethical behaviour.
ah, apparently there's an activity popular in the ea circles that is called “fiscal sponsoring” which deals with such unpleasantness. (in the meantime there's a question in the comments about puerto rico minimum wage compliance that's – by pure omission – left without any reply whatsoever)
i have not enough energy to check if that was mentioned before, but anyways it's a good reminder: the whole cozy enterprise is, indeed, not a registered tax-exempt organisation, and none of the threee nonlinears returned by the irs search engine does seem to have anything in common with the nonlinear dot org.
the newag's narrative is generally bull; and the folks from the dragon sector do have legal representation.
also reverse engineering with the goal to make things interoperable is explicitly allowed by polish author's law (we do follow the continental copyright conventions in poland, so it's not entirely the same as what the common law countries understand as copyright)
i mean we did have situations where the puppet agent was leaking memory so badly it smothered the systems it was running on; we had resigned ourselves to simply run the bloody thing from cron.
(whispering, wheezing) kill me father, for i have read the comments