Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MY
Posts
2
Comments
269
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • 1% lows below 30 is what I call unplayable. Consistent 30 is my absolute minimum.

    That's fine for you to feel that way. I'm just saying that Tears of the Kingdom was Exceptionally well received, despite it running around 30fps with huge dips in performance during some gameplay. It is evident that some gamers (perhaps console/mobile gamers more so) are less sensitive to lower frame rates and dips in performance.

    In fact, 1% lows below 30 would disqualify almost any other game from even being rated playable by valve. But having cyberpunk run on the steam deck when it doesn’t run on a PS4 is a good sales pitch, so it’s clear why they verified it.

    Their verification page seems to show what they are looking for. I don't think mediocre frame rates stop a game from being verified.

  • Most people want stability (low change) for servers. Arch is typically run where plentiful software updates are welcome. It's not that you can't/shouldn't use Arch for servers, but it isn't the most conventional suggestion.

  • Can you explain what "breaks" you are experiencing?

    I'm running Fedora/KDE/Wayland on two machines here, and the only oddity I get regularly is on my system with one monitor in landscape and one in portrait. Sometimes half of the landscape screen seems to be funky until I turn the portrait monitor off and on again (almost like it is trying to put the two displays on one for some reason). Most everything else has been flawless.

  • I’ve previously been against trying Arch due to instability issues such as the recent GRUB thing.

    But you used Manjaro? 😂

    Go for it. If you use archinstall, it is incredibly simple to get up and running. The difficulty around Arch is quite overblown except perhaps when talking about people brand new to Linux. Even without archinstall, you are just following a guide in the wiki.

  • Few thoughts:

    1. What is being made? Can't really care about it without having some idea
    2. What makes this company's version of it worth our interest?
    3. How is it better than the FOSS solutions that in this day and age almost definitely already exist
    4. Why are we to put our faith in this group for pay once software when their two major products are SaaS?