But you don't understand, in 1992 the Democrats won the Presidency with like 40% of the vote on a message of "Republican but with less bigotry," which proves that Americans love their basic economic message of "fuck you get your own food, shelter, and medical care!"

this is the video that gave me a useful tool for stopping my intrusive thoughts, in case anyone is looking for relief

https://youtu.be/kvtYjdriSpM

(there are tons so I'm sure there might be better ones or ones that work better for other people...)

I bet a LLM wrote that headline.

Well that was nice of them to make a list of who wants to be primaried

The courts have to start finding these people in contempt and deputizing people to go enforce those orders on behalf of the court if law enforcement won't. The House won't exercise its duty to be a check on the President. The Senate has barely made a few weak gestures. All that's left are the courts. Well, and We The People.

didn't i just see any new sandman season announced though?

I feel like we have to be able to separate artists' bad behavior from our evaluation of the quality of their work.

Maybe there's a time limit? Maybe they have to be dead so they can't benefit from their work being sold.

Are there any non problematic artists/creators from 500 years ago who we nevertheless find their work product valuable to society today? What about science? Especially medicine with all the body snatching.

Neil Gaiman is almost certainly a sex pest based on all the women reporting. So I get not wanting to give him money. He hopefully gets it, too.

I like the suggestion of piracy as an approach...

welcome to the resistance, Marjorie

This is the inauguration all over again. This idiot thinks he has massive support from the people for his garish displays, until it gets close to time that will reveal how broadly hated he actually is, then either he or his team change things up to protect his fragile ego.

I'm very much against conspiracy theories, especially concerning our elections which are administered by many many independent entities. I was very concerned as I watched electronic voting machines - especially without paper trails - become more and more popular over the past 30 years. Even more as the industry consolidated and it came down to a handful of private, for-profit manufacturers.

The thing I've read about that is keeping the door of conspiracy open in my mind is the "drop off" rate, which has to do with the number of "President only" ballots, where only the President is chosen, and no down ballot votes are cast.

Apparently Trump's ballots have an unusually high - like statistically unlikely - drop off. And it's either only in or mostly in/more pronounced in swing states.

Even Chris Titus picked it up (3 hrs total, sorry)

https://youtu.be/UgIay64Obcs - Part 1 https://youtu.be/t-yr-Mgkhm0 - Part 2

Analysis takes a long time especially if you want it to be able to withstand scrutiny

lemmy.zip is definitely the best!

now telegram is going to insert random information about South African White genocide to every conversation. or it will be in every recommended reply at least.

Deportation is a legal process. These people have not been deported because they have not gone through a legal process.

uhh no. comparing our actual life experience today with the actual life experiences of our parents and grandparents is the only way to know if we're doing better, the same, or worse.

your argument is the argument of the domestic abuser and the authoritarian government and the rapacious theologian.

"be grateful for what you have" or "it could be worse" is shitty advice.

"The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class"

https://youtu.be/akVL7QY0S8A

Elizabeth Warren a long time ago told us what was coming, and it's either here or nearly here.

Alright I'm gonna try this hereditary math...

So these kids will have the same dad, making them at least half siblings.

Their moms are sisters making them first cousins.

So what are they like 3/4 siblings...?

I'm not sure I follow.

I'm starting from the assumption that OP genuinely wants to talk to women without being creepy (for lack of a better term), presuming that comes from his intrinsic association between "talking to a woman" and "attempting to establish a romantic relationship with that woman."

That's a thought that's undesirable and presumably persistent. Sort of the definition of "intrusive."

I'm aware that the pop psych understanding of the phrase is specifically about violent or violence associated thoughts but those are the ones more people have and that probably are more disturbing than annoying.

When your parents say, "did you talk to any of them," they mean did you strike up a conversation with a woman with no presumption of potential romantic outcome.

When you say it, it seems like you're assuming there's a potential for a romantic outcome in every conversation between heterosexual men and women.

Your goal should be to strike up a conversation with a woman about random topics of interest, including very shallow ones, with no expectation that you're evaluating her as a potential mate, and she's not evaluating you.

Yes, we're all subject to intrusive thoughts so from time to time, you'll fail at this goal and start thinking about a romantic path. That's fine. Just acknowledge it to yourself and endeavor to do better.

It will probably take time and practice. Give yourself grace to try and fail and learn. You'll know you're succeeding when you realize you had a conversation with a woman without her gender being a consequential thought in your mind.

The same federal laws from Reconstruction applied across the whole country. Except there were "creative" legislators, executives, lawyers, and citizen organizations in the South that found loopholesto exploit. Most people in the North didn't do that (obviously there were exceptions).

Add to that the violent, murderous rampages that occurred against successful black people and neighborhoods, and "Reconstruction" was very complex in its implementation.

People know what 60 Minutes is.

They don't know what Skydance is, and definitely don't care about it (that's not necessarily 'good').

They sort of know what Paramount is, from movie title sequences, but they don't care about it more than any other movie production company. (Again that's not necessarily 'good.')

Going public like this is a great answer to Trump's bullying.