Skavau @ Skavau @piefed.social

Posts

923

Comments

293

Joined

5 mo. ago

Moderating

---

To be clear, those are not the only examples of female led shows in that list.

Do you consider Fallout or The Last of Us as examples? I didn't list those shows because as franchises they obviously have a much larger male audience, but if you are going purely by lead... then it also counts. And many others.

I also realise I missed Big Little Lies, The Morning Show and Fleabag.

High Potential and Deadlock don't have anywhere near the average rating and amount of votes to get near a list like this.

Also I would argue The Queen's Gambit, When They See Us, Shogun, Mrs Maisel, Anne With An E, Normal People, Maid, Unbelievable, Atlanta, This Is Us, Heartstopper, Mare of Easttown - all present on this list, are all exceptions to your claim as either being female-led, or having notable progressive themes and/or a heavily minority cast.

So what happens now in regards to Dbzer and Hexbear, if I may ask? That seemed pretty unruly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_industrial

Yes, but they can't make use of the name on Reddit. So if you didn't like how r/movies was made, the odds are there's no intuitive name for a subreddit to take left to try and compete with them.

Not that you even can effectively compete with them because subreddit promotion on reddit is total garbage.

Watching some objectively bad shows makes you realize how braindead a lot of reviewers are. Especially with modern shows that have 40+ minute filler episodes that exist just because the streaming service wanted to stretch the season out to 10+ episodes.

I mean, this has always existed. TV shows were much more stuffed with filler during the episodic network era.

Btw OP you considered taking data from Serializd too.

Seems to work. You will only see it if you login from piefed.

Piefed automatically has cross-community posting. You can see the comments here there from piefed.social if you link to same url.

Not an expert here, but stuff like Ted Lasso?

I have it under "Tabletop" on Forumverse for context:

https://piefed.social/f/tabletop

Op, might I suggest cross-posting this to !television@piefed.social too. I am biased as I run that place but this topic is technically off-topic here.

Tbh they do also cancel low-rated shows too. You just don't care when they do.

Or at least until it makes migration seamless

It obviously depends on the community, but for literature/television/art/video-games/movies/sporting/news communities there's always a stream of relevant news and commentary and releases to post.

Also we built up the original lemm.ee television instance to higher straits before that. It was soaring just before lemm.ee announced its shut down and put a spanner in the works.

It has literally worked for my community. You have to get a community on the map to begin with. If no-one knows it exists, no-one is gunna post to it in the first place.

Flooding a community with news/journalistic/article type content, if you're willing to keep doing it genuinely does work (topic of the community depending). If you run a community where there is a constant stream of news and articles coming out that can be posted to it, people will naturally click in and comment. Some will subscribe, increasing the glass ceiling each day.

The worst thing you can do is have periods of non-activity because you can't think of anything original to post, and no-one else is going to do it because the community has dropped off all trending metrics. Fake it until you make it.

I'd object and probably complain and it'd get your instance blacklisted. I'd support all community migrations being made publicly known - so you can see the timestamps and paper trail of a community.

But this isn't quite the way that community migration would work here - it's not quite the same thing. You would be attempting to give the impression I am actively contributing to a community I'm not - whereas I'm talking about moving a community from instance A to B. The community for all intents and purpose is the same.

If I posted actively to a community I do not own or moderate and they moved server and thus took my posts there with them, I wouldn't really object to that.

Well currently an admin could easily intervene and stop a migration by removing the community mods, to be fair.

For example, now that I am working on an AP server, I can take all your posts on !television@piefed.social and mirror them on !television@metacritics.zone. I could also avoid sending notifications to you, so you'd be aware of this only if you visited the site directly. How would you feel about that?

I mean you could just copy my posts anyway manually, if you were so inclined. There wouldn't be much I could do about it no matter how you did it.