I get it, but you're both part of a bigger problem.
People who make low effort AI bashing commentary videos, but it's just them reading a script over some stock footage. You shouldn't be making worse content than an AI my guy.
You're viewing a single thread.
worse content than AI
False.
Many of them really consider their spoken part to be the majority of their content, the stock footage is there to keep our attention, it isn't necessarily the whole point of their channel and lets them get their points across without spending tons of time or money on their own footage. Many of this style of youtuber will also include charts, graphs, or diagrams when relevant between the stock footage. It gets them more views than some boring powerpoint style presentation between graphics.
Yes, I agree. I'm often interested in what they have to say and the charts and graphs are a major bonus.
Stock images as visual filler don't bother me.
This is 1000x better than an AI video.
May I direct your attention to: https://youtu.be/gfr4BP4V1R8?si=KtWrbCSwdfY-bRQG ( just add stock footage in your head )
You may not.
Too late!
Daaammmnnnn yooouuuuuuuu!