PhD moron asks why no one is talking about NIH cuts
PhD moron asks why no one is talking about NIH cuts


PhD moron asks why no one is talking about NIH cuts
You're viewing a single thread.
In all honesty though, 60%+ overheads from a university is incredibly high. To an extent that shows that there is a large amount of management and administrative staff not contributing directly to the work. I'm not in medicine, but in the EU projects I'm in only 0-25% of overheads are funded. Though, I can imagine medicine requiring more than the hard sciences.
I’m under the impression that the cuts are from ~30% to ~15%
60% makes sense when you consider something like LIGO, or other real-estate heavy physics experimentation grounds, like a neutrino detector.