Nazi lives DO matter according to the mods of europe@feddit.org

Not really "powertripping". Just pathetic. Consider this a notice to avoid feddit.org... I've unsubbed and blocked the instance.

We can't dehumanize fascists for their choice to dehumanize everyone for things outside their control though, because that would be mean, and hurt their sociopath feefees!

Europe stool idly by throughout the 1930's "tolerating" fascism, and the Nazi's killed over 100 million people. Don't make the same mistake as the radical centrists of history. Fascists will not afford you the same tolerance or courtesy.

You're viewing a single thread.

299 comments

Well, yeah. We don’t condone murdering murderers, either.
- Depends on the murderer. Dexter has great ratings because people do in fact support murder of people who kill and aren't being held accountable, at least in theory.
  
  At least in fiction. Big difference.
  
  Luigi seems to have a lot of support as well. In reality.
  
  I think the key difference is that no one was bringing Brian Thompson to justice.
  The nature of humans is that they seek justice for themselves. Congress and the courts are, in theory, an uneasy compromise to offer people justice in exchange for demanding that they don’t go out and make justice for themselves. Because we’ve seen where that leads, and it sure isn’t good.
  You can believe in the rule of law and still think Brian Thompson deserved to die. Because by any legal standard, he committed more homicides than pretty much everyone on death row. And yet, somehow, our system is so twisted up that it is fine. Everything Thompson did was perfectly legal. Just like slavery, segregation, and the holocaust.
  I don’t think killing CEOs at random is a route to any good thing. Bringing random violence into the political equation serves one side only, and it is not ours. But it is perfectly consistent to condemn murder and still support Luigi, in reality.
  
  no one was bringing Brian Thompson to justice
  You're not wrong, but the issue is that as fewer and fewer people believe that the law will actually hold anyone accountable, they'll decide the correct thing to do is to take it into their own hands.
  And, if there's anything that's been very, very, very, very, clearly shown over the last 2 or 3 years in the US it's that the rule of law does not apply to anyone who is rich, famous, or is capable of wielding sufficient soft power.
  If you're one of those 3, then absolutely nothing you do is illegal, and once you've reached the point where the justice system will not do anything to those that wrong you, the only thing you have left is to go out and take action yourself, which historically has almost always been violence.
  I would expect there to be more, rather than less, of these types of murders from here on - especially given that everyone in this country either has a gun, or is a 15 minute background check away from having one.
  
  You’re not wrong, but the issue is that as fewer and fewer people believe that the law will actually hold anyone accountable, they’ll decide the correct thing to do is to take it into their own hands.
  Very much so. I was meaning to imply as much, when I threw that little "in theory" into how congress and the courts are supposed to work.
  
  The class war will not be televised!
  But also there other things people can do to fight it besides violence. Yeah it aint as glamorous as taking down a CEO parasite for entire nation to align behind.
  Advocate for your wages, mind your privacy and be a shrewd consumer...
  Deny parasite profit hurts them it just would take millions to really punish these parasites.
  But yeah people with nothing to lose which are being minted daily by thousands will do their thing... I always wonder why the old are such bootlickers. Seems like a fine way to go out. But boomer is too selfish, too scared of death to do anything but bootlicker the capital class while telling his child to work harder.
  
  legal […] like the holocaust.
  Funnily, German law did not change during the holocaust, and Germany still convicts people for being accessories to murder in concentration camps under the laws of the 1940s.
  
  And yet.... German ruling oligarch clan is made up of people who obtained their capital from slave labour.
  Amazing how that works, aint it?
  
  “There is only what is and that's it. What should be is a dirty lie.” — Lenny Bruce
  There’s no justice inherent in the world. The nature of things is that the ruthless and powerful will prosper. That is why setting up systems of justice and maintaining them is important. They will never be perfect or even close to it, but having them is better.
  
  That is why setting up systems of justice and maintaining them is important.
  If the system is only applied to the working class, how much justice is there within the system?
  Such system is not about justice but about the ruling class maintaining order to protect their assets from the slave labour that generates wealth for them.
  
  I do get what you’re saying. The system is unjust. It is. What I am saying is that the unjust features of the system have nothing to do with the system. It’s just the nature of people. You could have the American system, or the Soviet, or anarchism, or Star Trek, or whatever, but the people with more power assembled to themselves will always be able to dominate the less powerful to some degree. Until you start doing a full Harrison Bergeron power-equalizing system, which of course is enforced by a Harrison Bergeron central all-powerful wait wait wait….
  I do get what you mean, that the American system is corrupt and oligarchic. It is. I just am saying that any theory where you want to do whatever-else instead of the American system needs to take into account where the corruption in the American system comes from, and put up some strong defenses against it in whatever new way we’re doing instead.
  
  I don't have any lofty goal about system being fixed... but the criminals who currently are getting benefit of it, instead of getting the dick of the law must be exposed.
  They should not feel comfortable living among people they exploit.
  Asset owners hate being discussed in such light online, so I think they should be discussed more. It aint much bu it is honest work.
  
  Condemning murder wasn't the argument though, it was condemning all murder including against particular people or groups who want to or have committed murder like nazis. Luigi is the evidence that if a system protects those types of people from repercussions, the person who corrects them tend to get support from general public which runs counter to condemning all murder.
  At this point it's just semantics between physical violence and actions that lead to death like economic or social violence like what we see from united health and nazis.
  
  At this point it's just semantics between physical violence and actions that lead to death like economic or social violence like what we see from united health and nazis.
  A discussion that no self respecting regime would permit in a broad day light...
  
  So writing the policy that deliberately withholds rightful treatment, causing thousands of people to die, is not similar to actively strangling them? And a self respecting regime shouldn't be having a discussion about how people with power use that power to the detriment of their fellow man and what the consequences should be to prevent the fallout of more luigis?
  
  you sound like a domestic terrorist mate, final warning.
  
  I sound like a domestic terrorist for articulating that physical violence isn't that far off from economic or social violence and that the failure to enforce penalties against them will lead to people lashing out as we have seen multiple times historically? And that we should have a discussion about that to avoid people continuing to stew in poor conditions that ultimately lead to someone lashing out? You sound like an apologist and someone who is unconcerned with the general welfare of their fellow man.
  
  I just want peace, love and unicorns, Luigi's act upset the fantasy world I live in... where hard work pays, the leadership is good, healthcare quality is good, and the poor deserve being poor.
  Neo liberalism has brought prosperity for all the best people and I can't stand see lazy people now trying to roll back the reforms that permitted us to prosper this well.
  
  To be clear, at no point have I advocated violence. I have pointed out why some people may be moved to violence in response to non physical kinds of violence that do not provoke consequences Then said it was semantics between a murderer and a person who kills by policy, which would reason that it should result in harsher penalties for the people who kill by policy.
  All that to prevent more abused people taking power into their own hands.
  Again, at no point did I advocate for violence or terrorism. Please learn to read.
  
  To be clear, at no point have I advocated violence.
  I never seen anyone on fedi advocate for violence but I have seen a lot of mods remove content they did not like and claim that tit was "advocating violence"
  Also, I apologize I was being sarcastic, I agree with your analysis.
  
  I think the key difference is that no one was bringing Brian Thompson to justice.
  Who is bringing Putin, Trump or Netanyahu to justice?
  
  One is a corporate executive, the other three are sovereigns.
  
  Your point is?
  
  Legally one can be held accountable, the other three have to be deposed or theoretically could be impeached but legal process doesn't work for that
  
  Thus my question - who is bringing them to justice. Your point is?
  
  Nobody, because they are leaders of nation states so unless the nation state fails or there is a regime change, they are above the law. That's the entire premises of being a ruler, no matter what "democracy" lovers would like to believe. That's port of social contract people implicitly accepted.
  Nobody accepted oligarchs living above he law, albeit historically they sure have enjoying their best lives...
  But there were always counter forces within a few generation to clip their excesses.
  
  Asterion enters the chat
- If Hitler was assassinated before he started the war, millions wouldn't die.
  
  If Hitler had been assassinated right before the war, it might have been infinitely worse.
  The Nazis weren't predicated solely on Hitler. He actually was meant to be just a speechmaker while the smarter people made all the important decisions, because he was kind of an aggressive moron. Things got out of hand, though, and he was able to take over and to a large extent fuck everything up. A few of the attempts on his life were from other committed Nazis of a pretty high rank. The allies thought about trying to assassinate him, but decided ultimately that it was way better for the war effort if he was in charge.
  I don't think the movement would have petered out without Hitler and constitutional order restored. Not by 1939. They might not have exterminated the Jews quite so completely, but they might have, and they also might have stayed allied with the Soviets and won the war in spades. I think one of the few saving graces about the way it all went down was that Hitler was in charge, fucking everything up.
  The parallels to Trump are uncanny.
  
  Not by 1939. They might not have exterminated the Jews quite so completely,
  You don't have a clue.
  While the nazis obviously didn't rely solely on Hitler, in 1939 holocaust plans weren't even drafted.
  Plus, we are not in 1939 quite YET. If Hitler was killed after he came to power, war wouldn't even start.
  The parallels to Trump are uncanny.
  Of course sweetie. Keep telling yourself that until it is too late.
  
  I'm not sure if you are being condescending because you think you are right, or for some other reason. I wasn't even saying whatever you thought I was saying about 1939. You also have some of your history wrong.
  The camp system started instantly after Hitler came to power, as did sterilizations and abortions. Things ramped up from there. Systematic mass killing of Jews started in 1941, but it wasn't something that was off the table until "plans were drafted" to do something that they hadn't been ramping up towards. The plans that they drafted were systematic expansions of what had already been happening in a less organized fashion for years.
  Hitler didn't invent the idea of starting a war with all of the rest of Europe. He picked it up, along with a lot of other Geopolitik ideas, apparently from Karl Haushofer. That was back in the days when Hitler wasn't unequivocally in charge or even close to. How things would have played out without Hitler at the helm is totally uncertain of course, but plenty of other people had the ideas that became World War 2, and they appeared in Hitler's works all of a sudden in 1923 when he picked them up from Haushofer at the same time Hess and Ribbentrop did.
  It's possible that if he was killed in 1933 that we wouldn't have had the big war, just internal misery everlasting within Germany's borders or a ways beyond them. Like I say, it's also possible that the Nazi operation would have played out the same but been far more effective, if a little slower and less stylish without Hitler's high-octane speeches.
  We are clearly in early 1933 right now. Ten metaphorical days away from the Reichstag Fire, a little more than a month from the Enabling Act. Of course, we're not bound for things to play out in exactly the same fashion, but that's where we are on the timeline.
  Of course sweetie. Keep telling yourself that until it is too late.
  Not even sure what to make of this.
  
  Systematic mass killing of Jews started in 1941, but it wasn't something that was off the table until "plans were drafted" to do something that they hadn't been ramping up towards
  I wasn't planning to have historical debate here but you are clearly misinforming anyone who reads your comments.
  "Final solution" — mass murder — wasn't planned until 1941 and in 1940 Nazis were still toying with the idea of mass deportations to Madagascar instead.
  Just remind me, what is Trump trying to do at the moment?
  Not even sure what to make of this.
  Go figure.
  
  Holocaust as a mass murder wasn’t planned until 1941
  400,000 people were sterilized in 1933. Gas vans were killing mental patients in 1939. The Einsatzgruppen were traveling with the army in 1939, shooting Jews en masse in some cases. "Aktion T4" was put into practice in 1940, also with mental patients. Eugenics scholars had been talking about exterminating those with inferior genes since 1920. The deportation to Madagascar was talked about under the assumption that the harsh conditions and lack of civilization would leave most of the Jews to die "naturally." Deliberate starvation in the ghettos killed tens of thousands of Jews before a formalized "final solution" was planned for. And so on.
  Not sure how you got that my "ramping up" description was misinforming people. That's what happened. As much fun as this is, I have completed as much of this conversation as I want to have.
  
  400,000 people were sterilized in 1933. (...)
  Again, your point is? Mass murder of Jews wasn't planned until 1941. In 1940 Nazis were planning mass deportations to Madagascar. These are facts, I am not sure what is you are trying to achieve here?
  Furthermore, your comments only support my point as the goals escalate: Trump is attempting mass deportations now - like nazis were going to just before Final Solution
  If someone was to kill Hitler, neither WW2 nor Final Solution would have happened.
  
  Actually, hold on. Maybe you'll lose focus if I mention the mental patients.
  The Einsatzgruppen were traveling with the army in 1939, shooting Jews en masse in some cases. The deportation to Madagascar was talked about under the assumption that the harsh conditions and lack of civilization would leave most of the Jews to die “naturally.” Deliberate starvation in the ghettos killed tens of thousands of Jews before a formalized “final solution” was planned for. And so on.
  How's that?
  
  Sure, let me try one more time.
  Gas vans were killing mental patients in 1939. The Einsatzgruppen were traveling with the army in 1939, shooting Jews en masse in some cases. “Aktion T4” was put into practice in 1940, also with mental patients. The deportation to Madagascar was talked about under the assumption that the harsh conditions and lack of civilization would leave most of the Jews to die “naturally.” Deliberate starvation in the ghettos killed tens of thousands of Jews before a formalized “final solution” was planned for. And so on.
  Happier with that presentation? It concerns mass murder only, I removed the two sentences that added additional context but not specific actions of mass murder.
  
  Again, what is your fucking point here?
  That Nazis planned Final Solution before 1941? That's not true or at least historians didn't find any traces of that.
  That political goals escalate and mass murder start with smaller goals? Yes, 100%:
  Hitler started with eradicating Jews from public life, then planning to deport them, then murdering them.
  Trump started with eradicating migrants from public life, he is now deporting them. Go figure what's next.
  Hitler wasn't assassinated before he started a war killing millions. There was a chance but it didn't happen. Killing a potential mass murderer is definitely a lesser evil.
  
  The same if he had been detained.
  
  Not really. He was in charge of Germany, there was no chance for him being detained. Draw the conclusions yourself.

299 comments