Point taken.
I agree with "it's a liberation struggle, hamas is fair game" as a blanket public position from everyone that understands what's in play.
And the og post is from a public forum.
But maybe in lemmygrad we don't need the same blanket public position "between ourselves"?
Maybe the criticism is to not share those positions in public spaces, to not give any ammo to the genocidal settlers?
I see lemmygrad is technically a public space, but it's much smaller than xitter. And the audience generally understands what's in play.
Or is it the approach to dismiss the idea of discussing hamas completely, and keep focusing on the settlers atrocities, with a general "there's no need to talk hamas. It's a liberation struggle", including within lemmygrad?
I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that. But I'd probably disagree with the approach to how criticism was made in the op.