"It's ILLEGAL to steal peoples money"
"source?"
67Make me remember a conversation a guy claim he could easily went 2000 miles in one day, another response even at 70mph it would take more than a day, the guy just reply SOURCE? like some kind of trained reaction
15“Clause two of the anti robber 1898 act”
“Im not reading that”
(I have no understanding of the law)
10
I don't think the second one is whataboutism?
33Misidentifying the fallacy makes it all the more realistic.
59Yeah it's more of an imagineism
11
Just say "no"
24God, what an idiot. He’s not stealing your bank details, he’s politely asking for them.
20The majority of hacking is this right here.
8
There was a Russian guy I worked with once who was very argumentative and opinionated, but anytime he made a shitty point and you started to win the debate he would just say "that's a logical fallacy" and walk away, like he won the debate. He was difficult to be around.
17Funnily enough, the guy refusing to give their bank details IS presenting poor arguments. Of course, this is assuming that both parties have consented to enter a debate. If this was indeed a debate, it would kinda delve into a debate over the objectivity/subjectivity of morality as a whole.
17"What are your bank details?"
"... (No response)"
11
