The ones based on religion aren't legitimate either.
25ReplyWhat is the perspective here? Did they discover a reason or does it not exist?
5Replyit doesnt exist
1Reply
If its backed up by science then it wouldn’t be religious, mutual exclusivity there
5ReplyNot eating pork or shellfish with food preservation techniques available 6,000 years ago is definitely backed by science
21ReplyYeah, but outdated science doesn't count. That's just how science works.
Also, you don't have to be a scientist to avoid clearly spoiled seafood. Especially in the desert.
-2Reply
I hate homosapiens, they're bad for the planet.
5ReplyThen you should support gay people, they’re less likely to procreate.
4Reply
It's an empirical, scientific fact that I am a homophobe. Take that! /s
3ReplySome people don't trust others who like bitter stuff. I don't trust others who are into men. Even when they're women.
-3Reply