Programmers: false
60true
150
11
1
Can confirm. Am a programmer and my first thought was that mathematicians had recently come up with one of their wacky proofs that 2 does not equal 2, like how 1 is equal to 0.
261 == 0.9999999…
4
This is why fonts and kerning are so very important. But then again, the text in the boobs looks like it has extraneous spaces deliberately to look like that. There is a noticeable visual difference between
2! = 2and2 != 2when spaced properly.26I don't get it, why would 2! = 2 ? Can a mathematician explain it to me ?
162 != 2 is the statement that 2 is not equal to 2.
2! = 2 is the equation that two(factorial) equals 2
48"!" in math is the factorial symbol, and 2 factorial is just 2 times 1, which is 2.
12Whereas != is commonly used in programming as "not equal to".
So the mathematician see two factorial equals two, which is true.
The programmer sees two is not equal to two, which is not true.
2
factorial
0
Damnit. Got me. I’ve been a programmer for the better part of nearly 20 years but I was a math-heavy engineer first and I still freaking read that as “two-factorial”.
4P! = NP sounds like a fun find.
4What do the breasts have to do with anything?
2They help you focus on what's important
12I can find breasts 24/7, math problems not written on top of em
2
If both are horny enough, they won’t even see the characters and only see the cleavage.
1This is actually a great interview question
1It really depends on where the methaphorical comma is.
1Wouldn't mathematicians also see this as false?
4 = 2 is not correct.
-7Factorial is not the same as exponentiation.
15Now I look stupid, but I promise, I'm just too tired to think straight.
10
It's not 4. Wiki has a table and more info
5
