Increased use of Latvian in education does not infringe ethnic Russians' rights, rules European court
Increased use of Latvian in education does not infringe ethnic Russians' rights, rules European court
Education reforms introduced since 2018 which aim to increase the use of Latvia's sole official state language – Latvian – cannot be viewed as discrimination against Russian-speakers, the Europea...
Increased use of Mandarin, however, obviously infringes of Chinese minority rights.
Edit: just to be clear, many Chinese dialects have a lower lexical similarity than European languages. The standardization of Mandarin in education has had impacts on these dialects as well.
8What do you mean by "use"? Here the whole debable was about pre-school from what I understand. Russian is still studied as a language in primary school, let alone spoken home etc.
Also Latvian and Russian are quite different languages, although not so different as for example Estonian and Russian (where BTW similar measures in educations have been passed).
6
If that happened in China or Russia, headlines would be: "cultural genocide"
6Correct.
In Latvia the reason they are even having this discussion is because when USSR were occupiers they suppressed the local language (Latvian) with a brutal police regime, concentration camps, and the forced migration of ethnic Russians.
So yes - exactly. Moscovite Russia/ USSR started a cultural genocide in Latvia. This is just the fallout
4100%
2Well, they build camps and aim rifles at people they’re “educating” so maybe that’s why?
-6Compare how many Tibetans speak Tibetan with how many natives in US speak their languages (or Welsh, Irish, Scots, Bretonians, Sorbians etc etc etc wherever applicable) before you start to run your western supremacist nonsense.
4