Fedora 42 On 64-bit ARM Might Make It Seamless To Run x86/x86_64 Programs
Fedora 42 On 64-bit ARM Might Make It Seamless To Run x86/x86_64 Programs
36 comments
-
It is crazy how many highly skilled people put a lot of free work into pushing Linux forward, because of „let’s see, if we can get this thing working!”
I love the free software community.
-
A lot of people enjoy solving tricky and nuanced problems, and this is one. The fact that it yields really awesome outputs like this is, to some degree, just a bonus.
-
-
We might live in a strange world where it'll be easier to run Windows programs on ARM with Linux than on the OS they're written for.
-
Just ran a VR game for Windows just this morning, worked like a charm, didn't tinker one minute (using Proton and SteamVR, Valve with NVIDIA, just for context).
Then you also read things like https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2024/08/21/linux-scores-a-surprising-gaming-victory-against-windows-11/ on non technical websites... and can't help but wonder if it "will" be easier or... if it's already done.
-
Imagine if Wine became the new Windows. (Or became all that was left of Windows).
-
-
Imagine it becomes easier to run Windows x86 programs on Linux, than on Windows. And I won't be surprised at all if performance is better.
Imagine if THAT becomes Linux' killer feature.
A more lightweight system without the crazy system requirements, certain systems more stable and easier to get into for gaming, no ads and no spyware out of the box, no extra cruft nobody needs out of the box, and better support for x86 emulation on ARM.
Now THAT is a checklist to getting people interested.
There is also the free of charge aspect, but I'm not sure how appealing that would be, with Windows being bundled in.
Anything else I missed, feel free to let me know.
-
but how do I run it on confusingly named chinese sbc's for which the only os images that seem to exist are an untrustworthy debian based system and an old version of android?
-
You avoid buying them precisely because of this.
-
Running into this issue with nixos and the mango pi bored currently lol
-
yeah I think I have an orange, a mango, a nanopi, and a couple entirely written in chinese that are different from each other. Just before reddit went senile I was planning on posting images to try to ID the unknown ones but I didn't and got busy with stuff less likely to be a dead end.
Can anyone confirm if it is indeed the case that you can't just put whatever os you want on these things, or if it is possible by jumping through some hoops that google would never show me in favour of showing me other shit that makes them more money?
-
-
-
We can already run arm seamlessly on x86 Linux, why not use Qemu-user + binfmt misc the other way around? I guess FEX must be much faster. Im also not super keen to run binaries that can't be recompiled anyway so probably not the target audience.
Take that Java, everything is a portable binary now.
-
I miss Java.
-
I hate Java with the white hot passion of a thousand suns. It is baked into so many admin tools for hardware (Dell, Cisco, etc) and trying to connect to older hardware that requires a security model that isn’t supported anymore or has expired certs that are never getting updated is a giant pain in the ass. Run anywhere my ass. I have to keep special VMs with just the right version of Java and all the necessary tweaks (like having to tell it that certain older encryption methods are ok) to even access some of these tools. I’ve even had to surplus hardware that was perfectly fine accept for the fact I could configure it because of some stupid Java thing. In short Fuck Java with a rusty wire brush.
I’m not bitter at all 🤣
-
-
It's still around, with Oracle humping it's corpse.
-
-
-
That'd be cool.
I mean, can't you just run it with qemu-user anyway?
-
I guess it is more performant.
-
Let me know if I don’t know enough about what you are talking about, but I think your saying to use qemu to o run windows.
This is about running x86 code on arm processors, like what Apple does with Rosetta.
-
You can but the performance will be suboptimal
-
-
Does this mean my M2 Mac mini can finally run Linux well soon? Asahi works but is missing so much functionality
-
Out of genuine curiosity, what is it missing? I have to use macOS on my Apple Silicon computers, so I haven’t tried out Asahi.
-
There are support table on asahi wiki. For example, here is the support page of M2: https://github.com/AsahiLinux/docs/wiki/M2-Series-Feature-Support
It is missing thunderbolt, touch id, video decoder, video encoder, DP alt mode, pro res, PCIE etc.
-
-
36 comments