Hungary, Austria, Greece added to the Economist’s list of Putin’s ‘useful idiots’ in Europe
Hungary, Austria, Greece added to the Economist’s list of Putin’s ‘useful idiots’ in Europe
The Economist magazine has compiled a ranking of European countries that are currently the biggest facilitators of the Russian regime in Europe – but there’s no prizes for guessing which states make it to the list.
The Economist magazine has compiled a ranking of European countries that are currently the biggest facilitators of the Russian regime in Europe.
The original article by Economist has a paywall, that's why I posted that one instead, but here's the link: https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/07/03/-vladimir-putins-useful-idiots
11i find it a bit weird, to put Greece on the list for resisting sanctions, that severely affect the countries economy, while Hungary and Austria are straight up Muppets, enjoy the russian hand up their back.
9It's due to it's shipping firms doing shady business with Russian oil, more than directly because of a direct action of the government.
3The motivation might be different but the result is the same, facilitating the Russian regime financial moves.
3Austria has actively worked together with russian intelligence, including to help the former wirecard CEO flee to Russia through Austria, after the whole scandal became public and investors were defrauded of billions. Western intelligence agencies stopped sharing any information with Austrian intelligence as that would end up in Russian hands.
That is a whole different level of facilitating the Russian regime than continueing to trade in non military goods.
14
As a Hungarian, I would never think about Orbán and co as useful. Idiots? For sure ✅
9As an austrian, that's one more reason to be ashamed of our government. And it wont get better seeing as how popular the fpötards are :(
8Austria literally blocked Bulgaria and Romania from joining in Schengen Area... Splitting EU schengen borders into 2 (and left Greece with borders with Bulgaria) ..
6Not so much a list but three paragraphs:
Mr Putin’s enablers include several European governments. Viktor Orban, the prime minister of Hungary since 2010, has been the most obvious. The populist strongman has repeatedly criticised Western support for Ukraine and continued Hungary’s imports of Russian gas. His government also refuses to allow the transit of weapons given to Ukraine by Hungary’s fellow members of nato and the eu. Next-door Austria has, more quietly but equally profitably, largely sat out the struggle, too, citing its non-membership of nato and self-appointed role as a bridge between East and West, offering little aid to Ukraine even as its trade with Russia has surged.
Greece, another eu member, is complying with the eu’s sanctions, but has balked at tightening any further those on shipping Russian oil, perhaps because Greek firms happen to pocket so much from the trade. Only recently and under heavy American pressure did Cyprus, an offshore financial haven, shut down some 4,000 local bank accounts held by Russians. Facing less pressure, non-eu countries such as Turkey and Serbia don’t even bother to disguise the lucrative back-door service they provide to Russia.
Some countries have twisted seemingly noble intentions into policies that warm Mr Putin’s heart. Citing its vaunted neutrality, Switzerland has wielded arcane local laws to block the supply of arms to Ukraine, including 96 mothballed Leopard tanks sitting in Italy that happen to belong to a private Swiss firm. Scoring repeated own-goals with freedom of speech principles, police in Sweden have green-lighted public burnings of the koran. Not only has this hugely irked Muslim-majority Turkey, which wields a veto over Sweden’s bid to join nato. Mr Putin himself gleefully trolled the Swedes. On a trip to Dagestan before the Eid holiday at the end of June, Mr Putin had himself filmed tenderly holding a koran, as he explained that under Russian law it is a crime to desecrate holy things.
3Personally I'm glad that at least in some European countries it is NOT a crime to desecrate "holy" things.
10Agreed. I don't like the characterization of 'being loyal to your principles even when it's politically inconvenient' as an own-goal. This kind of thing tells us more about the author than the subject.
6