Inequality, Not Birthrates, Strains Social Security
Inequality, Not Birthrates, Strains Social Security
In the early 1980s, Alan Greenspan worked to secure Social Security's solvency until the 2050s not 2030s. Inequality straining the system.
Man, things would be way better for everyone if we just listened to Bernie once in a while (read: always)
18If Republicans were serious about cuts to entitlements, they would do it when they have power instead of cutting taxes. Of course, their voters depend on it, so they won't.
5I get what the title is trying to say, but it is pretty poorly written because low birthrates DO strain social security. However inequality causes lower birthrates which in turn strains social security
2I'm for reducing the birthrate to zero until inequality is fully addressed.
You have to either be a monster or truly not care about anyone to bring a non-wealthy child into this work camp as our very habitat fails by our own sabotage. Why? Because misery loves company? Because the job creators want new capital batteries for their progeny to drain the life force of?
Oh I know, because the owners promised 50 years ago that if we gave them ALL the money and power, and we did for some reason, one day they would emerge from their guarded towers to whip their cocks out and urinate golden showers of prosperity upon all of us, and though you won't live to see it, surely your child will amirite!
9
Anyone know or can find who funds them? I can't.
1Why not message him on Twitter, because it doesn’t look like any billionaire or even millionaire are funding this
https://x.com/realdaviddemos/status/1695135359955304774?s=46
1