No call on a blatant facemask. Vikings vs Rams
No call on a blatant facemask. Vikings vs Rams
Video Credit :https://x.com/ActionNetworkHQ/status/1849648663594926574
Worst part is also, isn’t this roughing the passer also with contact to the head of Darnold also? Or is he out of the pocket so it doesn’t count? Idk. Still insane to miss this
9ReplyThe consistency of penalty enforcement in the NFL is a complete joke. The disparity in pass interference calls is egregious.
8ReplyEspecially considering the money the make plus the fact how easy it was to avoid this. They have someone in the both anyways.
2Reply
Even without the facemask, that should be reviewable since the result of the play was a score. Makes no sense.
4ReplyAgreed but the play was reviewable. However, there are rules saying you can't call a new penalty during a review. This needs to change.
4Reply
I wouldn't mind facemask being added to the challenge list. It's such a black and white call
3Reply