12 mo. ago • 98%

It'll go great with our party's purple tiefling

20 comments

Canon is wrong, dragonborn have tails

65
- the official canon states that tieflings can't be purple, and yet the official artwork for a tiefling is a purple tiefling
  
  2
  
  Possibly the most ignored sentence in the PHB, even by Wotc themselves:
  
  Their skin tones cover the full range of human coloration, but also include various shades of red.
  
  1
  
  Official Dragonborn PHB description say Dragonborns are brown/rust coloured, with some being rust-copper green.
  
  Artwork on the same page is a red scaled dragonborn.
  
  1
This was settled years ago

38
- TROGDOR THE BURNINATOR!
  
  14
So they just have a scaly butt? I'm picturing a crocodile walking around except that instead of a tail it has butt cheeks like a human.

26
- Permanently Deleted
  
  49
  
  100% lore-accurate.
  
  19
  
  Like nothing at all
  
  19
I recognize that the council has made a decision, but given that it's a stupid-ass decision i've elected to ignore it.

15
This is the real reason I stopped playing D&D. The OGL stuff was just a smoke screen.

10
Why are Japan and Korea the same color on this map? 🤨

7
- It's a screen cap from a video talking about Japan's involvement in World War 2, where they invaded Korea.
  
  24
  
  https://youtu.be/xuCn8ux2gbs
  
  The video for those who are curious. Absolutely worth the 20 minutes.
  
  3
BG3 adds tail options for Dragonborn

BG3 removes the previously-tabletop-canon breast options for Dragonborn

7
You want a tail, play a Kobold!

6
I got around this by being a Path of the Beast Barbarian Dragonborn. I was a Weredragon and when I Raged I became more dragon like. I almost exclusively used the tail function for the shield reaction while still messing people up with a Magic Maul.

6
This only became an issue when we defeated a half dragon non-lethally and the DM was making small talk with the dragonborn.

3
Erm, tails are based, ofc my pc has one!

2

You've viewed 20 comments.