This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
76Replygolang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
31ReplyIMSA kid?
1Reply
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
5Reply
🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
54ReplyBut what if it was grown in Europe?
27ReplyNaranja
15ReplySo to clarify, definitely European and not African?
4Reply
Americans will use anything other than metric
4Reply
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
40Reply"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger's TeX
37ReplyI mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
25ReplyI can answer the question. No.
22ReplyHe’s right.
6Reply
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
20ReplyLook at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
19ReplyChrist, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
6ReplyI get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
3Reply
🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
8ReplyI am waiting for someone to actually answer this
7ReplyThanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
4ReplyOh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
1ReplyThanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving 😅
1Reply
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
2ReplyNyar!
1Reply