People Want Threads to Be Old Twitter. Threads Would Prefer Not To.
People Want Threads to Be Old Twitter. Threads Would Prefer Not To.
As Israel-Hamas misinformation floods X, Meta rejects calls to promote news content on Threads. Zuckerberg doesn't need to replace Twitter, he just has to destroy it.
Threads? I completely forgot about Threads because this is the first time I've seen news about it since the week it launched. And I doom scroll Lemmy Everything every night.
93I've never heard of the expression "doom scroll"! It's awesome! With your permission, I'll start using it.
I also doom scroll Lemmy every night (which is bad, since I should sleep, but good because I stopped going to Reddit)
4Btw, is there a Lemmy app where you can disable infinite scrolling / set to 50 items per page or so?
2It keeps getting bumps in adoption every time Musk does something stupid. So, weekly or so.
Honestly it's kind of a chill service. If it wasn't controlled by Meta, I'd be more active there. As it is, Mastodon is my jam.
1
The problem is that the painfully earnest people went to Mastodon, the funny people went to BlueSky, the celebs went to Threads, and the mid-tier YouTubers and Streamers and Podcasters who have to be Internet Famous every damned day or they don't get to eat stayed on Twitter.
Personally I'm pulling for Mastodon because I'm a painfully earnest person.
63That explains why I like Mastodon! Painfully earnest individual here.
7If there was only some way for people on different microblog websites to talk to each other...
Maybe some kind of open, decentralized protocol?
3If only. Some sort of text with added extra, like hypertext, and it could be used as a transport protocol. One can dream.
2
They want a social network designed in a way that single company have all control that would be abused after gaining enough users and advertisers?
43Bluesky is literally just old Twitter but better. Why do people insist on hurting themselves with Threads?
Edit: for those more technically inclined, it looks like there are now instructions on how to host your own Bluesky instance. It sounds like you may need a developer account before you can federate with the official instance though.
29Yeah the only problem with bluesky is that it still has such strict limits on who can join, and even who can see the content. Can't exactly make it your online home for announcements and such if most people can't see them there even if they wanted to.
32You know what makes the Nobel Prize so valuable? Not everyone gets one.
Blue sky is following the early Facebook playbook of artificial exclusivity. When the feeling of FOMO is widespread enough, they’ll gradually open the door wider.
Edit: I don’t mean to imply that blue sky is good like the Nobel prize is good. I just mean they’re using artificial scarcity to drum up demand.
-6
I'll never understand why people are so excited for something that is proprietary and invite-only...
Oh yeah, they're idiots. I suspect bluesky is paying for a lot of viral marketing.
17Nah, it's because it's less of a headache than Mastodon (everyone I've talked to likes the idea, but hates the implementation because they find it hard to navigate) and it's not a mess like Threads or Twitter. What people want is 2015 Twitter because they're not nerds. They want it to just work.
As for the invite-only thing, I found it odd at first, but I kinda understand why people like it now. It makes it harder for assholes to join and if they do manage to get an invite, they'll have to get another one after their account gets banned for bigotry or being a shithead.
-7
Bluesky might be better Twitter, but if people doesn't hear about it, or does not want to try it out, they'll stay on Twitter. Or if they can't stand Musk they go to Threads. Simply because those platforms are the biggest there.
11Maybe BECAUSE I HAVEN'T RECEIVED THE DAMN CODE!
10Although with their proprietary solution, there's a significant chance that Bluesky is going to be Twitter 2.0 if it ever gains traction. I'm rooting for fediverse to take off because my social media activity has shrunk to a couple of group chats with close friends and family plus occasional comments on Mastodon and Lemmy.
4
You know what would be hilarious? Eventually blue sky buys the leftovers of twitter and renames itself twitter. Although by that time it may not be a prudent move. So maybe not.
8Even funnier would be to buy x.com in the liquidation sale.
7
Because the majority of people don’t even know what bluesky is, and those who do can’t get an invite
8They're a lot more common than you think; you get an invite to give out every 10 days. It's just that you gotta ask around for them. If you're looking for an invite, try asking a furry. I think most of the furry community who wants to be on Bluesky is already there at this point, so there are probably a number of furries who have tons of unused invites.
8
I think the invite system slows people joining vs Threads easy sign up. I agree that it is straight up old Twitter and enjoying myself on it. I just started getting invites , they go fast but definitely give them out. Seems like every time I see a post about it I don't have a code to give out. Definitely need to just keep one on deck for the Lemmy comment section.
5I'll take a Bluesky invite if you have one, I'd get on there in an instant. But otherwise the answer to your question is people don't have the better option.
1
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The detritus at X quickly bubbled over to the rest of the internet — some of it promoted by Elon Musk himself — to the point that the European Union threatened to ban the app over the Israel-Hamas misinformation problem.
Last month, for example, the Washington Post reported that Threads had blocked users from searching for a variety of terms related to the news, including “Covid.”
The company made a number of desperate changes across its family of apps over the last year or so to try and make users have a more pleasant experience online, tamping down news among them.
Since then, Twitter never approached Facebook or Instagram’s numbers, but in terms of cultural relevance, it’s always been one of Zuck’s only real social media competitors
Today, the prevailing model comes from TikTok, a platform that looks more like TV, with content made by people you’re only connected to as a fan or consumer.
Bluesky and Mastodon, the hippest Twitter replacements, are happy to embrace news, but they’re comparatively tiny platforms, and the fun comes from the network effects of a large user base.
The original article contains 823 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
13Most useful bot ever.
8MUBE!
2
wait, people still use threads?
9Lol, good luck at trying to get meta to listen to what users really want.
8Be careful what you wish for, folks!
5What will they thread next to mastodon mastodon is the old Twitter, people were brainwashed by these two stinkers
5People leaving twitter for instawords deserve to be let down
4Not to overly focus on aesthetics, but maybe Zuckerberg could take a few minutes away from his daily groping of paid-friends, and instead work with an acting coach to develop a look for photos that isn’t best described as Robot Rictus.
3One would assume he can afford eyebrows now.
2