Self Defense vs War Crimes
Self Defense vs War Crimes
History is written by the winners. And they decide what was a crime and what was self defense.
11But why are the people of a certain color so consistently the winners?
1
I thought people here didn't like racist jokes
1What a rubbish take on history.
Pray tell, name ONE historical war criminal, one who basically everyone agrees was a war criminal. You know exactly who I'm alluding to. Everyone knows his name, and I literally don't need to say more than this because everyone already knows who I'm talking about.
Now, what was his skin colour?
I can think of more counterexamples but I'd just be wasting my time at that point.
-10Robert Bulwer-Lytton, George Curzon, and Winston Churchill. Their actions are not considered criminal even to this day - in fact, the first two people are not even known by the common masses. Read about how they are responsible for creating a system of artificial famine in the Indian subcontinent in the 18th, 19th and 20th century respectively. Why is it that just after the Indian independence, there were no major famine?
Those are just three names, British to be exact, and there's many more out there, but I'm pretty sure there's also Portuguese, Dutch, Danish and French war criminals. It is just that they're "lost in history", because history is written by the winners, it seems.
24So you have to be literally Hitler to break this pattern? Got it
1Nope, just that Hitler is one notable counterexample. There are plenty more European war criminals.
Don't forget Hideki Tojo too. Not white, but still a light-skinned war criminal.
Vladamir Putin is wanted for crimes against humanity right now. There is a warrant out for his arrest.
And are we just allowing the current situation in Israel to slip our minds voluntarily?
2
Man these people are so lost in their stupid ideology lmao
There's a shit ton of white war criminals that everyone knows about. And literally every war criminal justifies their actions in some way, usually defense.
0