Skip Navigation

what if i installed lubuntu on an extremely powerful computer?

would the performance be huge and be very awesome?? if i had a computer with the latest amd ryzen chip and with 4tb of ssd and 16gb of ram and installed lubuntu on it, what would happen?

has anyone ever tried this??

27 comments
  • I didn't see many legitimate answers to your question here so I'll try. Forget the details such as specific processor and memory. Don't get lost in the details of this anology.

    Imagine you have a very basic computer and a very advanced, powerful computer. You install Lubunutu on each. The basic computer might require 5% of it's resources just to run the operating system. The advanced computer needs just 0.5% of it's resources to run the OS.

    This sounds like a big difference. 10x more resources required for the basic computer! Really though one has 95% left to run other things and one has 99.5%.

    If I gave you two glasses of water that were 95% full and 99.5% full you could easily tell the difference between the two. One is basically overflowing and the other is just full. You wouldn't describe either as being half full though.

    Now imagine you put something like Fedora workstation on that basic computer. This OS is designed for powerful workstations not basic hardware. The basic computer is going to struggle to run it. Let's say it uses 30% of it's resources just to run and spikes to 70% usage when you open anything else.

    Put that half full glass of water next to the others. Definitely a big difference and you're going to know it.

    Things like Lubunutu aren't designed to make powerful computers fast it's meant to make more basic hardware useable. The powerful computer is going to be fast no matter what and you probably want some of the features left out of an OS designed for pure efficiency.

    Alpine Linux's storage requirements are measured in MBs. My router runs a version of Linux. Supercomputers run versions of Linux. Software should be matched to hardware and needs.

    Hopefully this helps you!

  • You have to think in terms of bottleneck. If you have a really heavy desktop environment or operating system, then it can (and will) slow down older and weak computers. For those, it makes sense to install some special prepared environments, so it does not slow them down. If you have a modern and fast computer with plenty of resources, then it won't make a difference which you install.

    In example, you have 16gb RAM, but your system uses only 4gb. Switching to a system that uses only 2gb won't get you any benefit, you have plenty of room that is unused. And for all other daily operations in the Window environment, lets say opening and closing windows with some effects and transparency, would lets say for fun require 1ghz of CPU to calculate without slowing the operation down. If you have a modern multicore CPU with 5ghz, then you don't win anything by installing a desktop environment or operating system that makes use of only 0.5ghz.

  • Not sure what you're definition of "powerful" is, but this friendica node, https://friendica.eskimo.com/ runs on an I9-10980xe (18 core / 36 thread) clocked at 4.5Ghz with 256GB of RAM, 29TB of raid 1 disk space (three RAID partitions, two nvme1G raided, and two partitions of two 14TB each raided). It runs great with 6.14 kernels. I was less satisfied with the task switching on earlier kernels, it typically runs with around 1000 processes. I run non-preemptive tickless kernels.

27 comments