That's a logical fallacy.
If exists -> porn
Does not mean
If porn -> exists
66What the slippery slope did you just say to me you little strawman? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in appealing to emotion, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on loaded questions. I am trained in fallacy warfare and I'm the top debater in my entire high school. You are nothing to me but just another bandwagon. I will attack your character instead of engaging with your argument with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this site, mark my anecdotes. You think you can get away with making logically sound arguments over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak, I am contacting my secret network of trolls across the Internet and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for our fallacies, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call logic. You're no fucking scotsman, kid. I can be ambiguous anywhere, anytime, and I can derail your discussion in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my false cause. Not only am I extensively trained in irrational argumentation, but I have access to the entire arsenals of comments sections that I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable argument off this continent. If only you could have known what unholy middle ground your little "logical" argument was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking burden of proof. But you couldn't, you you didn't, and now you're begging the question, you black or white idiot. I will shit ad hominem all over you and you will appeal to nature in it. Tu quoque, kiddo.
26Do you excell at debating would you say? Perhaps you are a master debater?
6
🤓
11
Certified affirming the consequent moment
21Holy hell
Actual inversion fallacy
18Ignite the truth table
6
there's no porn of you, do you exist?
10What makes you so sure about that?
7
The rule is actually:
if it can be imagined, there is porn of it
8If the concept exists.
6
