11 mo. ago • 82%

Now that some believe me, What if a publicized DRS count of >76M actually breaks the math? What if ALL of the "Cede" quarters are actually hiding a massive increase in DRS?

A full year later, we have "yet" to break 76M again.

In this post here https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/381421, we discussed how the numbers are likely much higher than are currently reported. This heavily implicates Cede/DTCC because every quarter requires fraudulent reporting (well played SEC).

But how much higher? We've been at 75M for exactly 4 quarters now. Estimates at the previous pace would have us over 130M shares DRSd at this point.

This would mean there are very few shares actually left out there. Roughly only 26M left to DRS before they truly start to panic from the math-breaking number. The DTCC definitely fucked up by thinking we couldn't buy the entire thing lol.

They warned you there would be FUD, this is it. Keep DRSing and eventually ComputerShare will stop selling to us like they said they would if there are no locates ;).

With that in mind, also don't forget the $149T bullet swap that hits instantly on December 15th. Since they opened that particular short, the stock has seen a 390% increase along with a 430% rise in interest rates, do think they roll that shit over ;)?

I will leave with the same question: Why do you think Gamestop changed the wording from 03/22/2023 onward?

21 comments

In no way do I believe DRS numbers have stagnated for this long. There are either concerted efforts being made to hide the truth via legal jargon, or im a monkeys uncle

26
- Permanently Deleted
  
  15
- Price action has been weird and volatile again lately after a slow and steady grind down. Seems like something is brewing.
  
  6
  
  the timing of the increase in volume corresponds to the Heat Lamp Theory's conjecture, although there may have been other factors as well
  
  8
- Something I've not seen anyone discuss... perhaps because it's a very unpleasant thought.
  
  What if the flood of purple circle posts on reddit are fake? If a majority are posted by bad actors, then SHF pull shares they DRS'd, wouldn't that leave the numbers static?
  
  5
  
  I'm trying to think of a less tinfoil answer and I can't. Something doesn't add up, big time.
  
  9
  
  Possible, but not probable imo
  
  GME fervor doesnt suddenly die at 76m shares
  
  9
  
  Could be. Every day it seems more clear that most of what we are publicly provided or witness online and in media has been fabricated.
  
  6
  
  I haven't been back there since the exodus; has there been a continuous flood of purple circles there while the DRS numbers themselves are stable?
  
  If so, is there an Occam's Razor explanation that is simpler than crime?
  
  3
What a sham market we have.

Potempkin market.

You know what, I amend that. It's a sham world. When are we collectively going to band together and pull back the curtain on The Great and Powerful Oz?

Hopefully soon. Glad to be standing shoulder to shoulder with you all here pushing for that reveal. 👊

9
Wouldn't a close look at the ledger solve the question ?

I would totally do it myself if I was living on the same side of the Atlantic as Grapevine, Texas, but it is not the case.

Is someone volunteer to die for the cause (again) and go check the ledger manually ?

8
- To my understanding, the ledger doesn't reveal DTC tuckery. In the ledger you will find a one-liner to the effect that DTC has the rest of the shares.
  
  To prove their fuckery we would need to see the DTC ledger, but it’s a private corporation above the law 🤮
  
  Lucky for us, we can lock the float and they can’t stop us 💎💪
  
  9
  
  But looking at the ledger you would be able to tally everyone else.
  
  4
- At a certain point I will feel a strong need to check the ledger myself, just to make sure that I am on it :)
  
  4

You've viewed 21 comments.