AI-generated lesson plans fall short on inspiring students and promoting critical thinking
AI-generated lesson plans fall short on inspiring students and promoting critical thinking

AI-generated lesson plans fall short on inspiring students and promoting critical thinking

When teachers rely on commonly used artificial intelligence chatbots to devise lesson plans, it does not result in more engaging, immersive or effective learning experiences compared with existing techniques, we found in our recent study. The AI-generated civics lesson plans we analyzed also left out opportunities for students to explore the stories and experiences of traditionally marginalized people.
The allure of generative AI as a teaching aid has caught the attention of educators. A Gallup survey from September 2025 found that 60% of K-12 teachers are already using AI in their work, with the most common reported use being teaching preparation and lesson planning.
Without the assistance of AI, teachers might spend hours every week crafting lessons for their students. With AI, time-stretched teachers can generate detailed lesson plans featuring learning objectives, materials, activities, assessments, extension activities and homework tasks in a matter of seconds.
However, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot were not originally built with educators in mind. Instead, these tools were trained on huge amounts of text and media drawn largely from across the internet and then launched as general-purpose chatbots.
I feel so sorry for the newer generations.
I mean, my generation got fucked, and I was born under Carter. The main difference is younger folks were raised jaded, so there was little to adjust to. I'd hang out with friends who had three siblings in a house they owned with two cars on a single income complete with full pension at 55.
That's what was promised to us. The young-uns never saw what things used to be like. It's one thing to hear stories, but the mid-'80s may as well be the moon landing, JFK, usw.
Pension at 55? Hahahahahahahahahahahha