They bought Allegorithmic, put their Substance products behind a subscription, and discontinued Substance Painter's Linux release because it was inconvenient to their subscription model. Adobe can vanish off the face of the fucking earth for all I care.
A VM does the job. For me as a Manjaro user at home have no problems with flexibility. And as an Apple Mac User at work there can't be more suffering. 😜
Adobe acrobat has 3 tiers
Free which is useless
Acrobat which has 90% of everything you'll ever need except for that one time you'll need to censor a portion of the document which is only available in
Acrobat pro which is another 10$ a month on top of regular acrobat (20$ a month) and offers literally 2 extra features that previously were not separated.
Or you can change the highlighter to black and use that instead.
Realize this but my companies solution was to just print that version and scan back in the resulting version which cannot be undone. Stupid and wastful but saved us from buying a ton of Adobe licenses.
Their lower level employees. Despite record profits and despite the fact that these decisions are mandated by C-suite executives, these fines will “require” layoffs to appease the shareholders.
They could just accept that their practices are corrupt and actually change, but that’s not as easy as just laying off several thousand of the ordinary workers who do most of the work.
Adobe has revealed it may have to fork out "significant monetary costs or penalties" as a result of a US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation of its subscription cancellation practices.
President of digital media David Wadhwani celebrated record numbers of new commercial subscriptions for Adobe Creative Cloud.
Adobe's filing reveals that the regulator is considering its actions regarding "our disclosure and subscription cancellation practices relative to the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act."
That Act, as explained by law firm Hinch Newman LLP, means outfits that offer subscription services must never:
Adobe's filing reveals that in November 2023, FTC staff "asserted that they had the authority to enter into consent negotiations to determine if a settlement regarding their investigation of these issues could be reached."
But it's warned investors that defending the matter – or paying fines if it can't do so – could cost it enough to "have a material impact on our financial results and operations."
The original article contains 380 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!