Not just a twist. It tries to shove crypto in your face and monetize your browsing time constantly. There are far better alternatives like Vivaldi and Firefox that don't do that nonsense at all.
Probably because most don't know what Chromium is, or what open-source means or why certain websites don't work (or work as well as in Chrome). Sad but true.
most of the population isn't tech-savvy enough to know about different browser types, or care about which one they're using. The reason chrome is so dominant is because it comes pre-installed on many devices, and so people just don't bother to change it.
I've used only ublock for a while and haven't had any issues with sites detecting adblock. Heck, even with the recent youtube debacle I still block ads on yt and haven't noticed any of the things people are complaining about. Though, I have youtube enhancer as well which also blocks ads.
Vivaldi still uses Chromium as a base, so you're still supporting Google and Chrome. Literally only Firefox and its forks use a different rendering engine (used to be Gecko, I think it's Quantum now). If you are using a browser with Blink as a rendering engine, you're using Google code, and Google will still be in control of your browser.
if I recall correctly many adblockers (including uBlock origin) stopped working a while ago on chrome when chrome implemented manifest v3.0 for extensions
Hasn't happened quite yet. uBlock Origin on Chrome is much less robust than on Firefox, that's for sure. Manifest 3 is finishing it's rollout this month and we're looking at not being able to functionally use adblockers in Chrome very soon.
Ah okay, thanks for the info. I don’t use chrome myself and haven’t been reading up on the whole ordeal recently so my information was a bit outdated lol