Skip Navigation
19 comments
  • As a physicist with a background in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics before moving to quantum information theory, let me reassure you that I speak from training and decades of experience when I say, "No, you dork ass loser."

  • He solved the is-ought problem? How did he do that?

    what ought to be (what is probable)

    Hey guys I also solved the is-ought problem, first we start with is (what we should do)...

  • While I am purposefully misconstruing the two definitions here, there is an argument to be made by this very principle that the post-selection effect on culture yields a convergence of the two

    What's cooler than doing a mid bit with awful delivery and immediately explaining it? Trying to spin it into a serious argument by vomiting nonsense jargon.

    I don't want to hear a word of complaint about obscurantist poststructuralists from this guy or anyone who likes him.

  • so if i'm reading this right, he's basically saying that bestest social values exist in societies that change least with time, or in other words he's saying that the only moral position is to be reactionary

    i don't know if it counts as mask off because mask wasn't ever really there

    • Being able to derive reaction as the One True Political Movement via immutable physical laws sounds like a wet dream for some people.

  • E/Acc where Might makes Right, is the not at all repulsive and most ontologically sound source for ethics! Not at all burting at the seems with perverted eugenics, it's not morally dubious if none of your enemies survive to criticise you!

19 comments