South Carolina Senator Tim Scott opposes the PRO Act
From "the desk of Tim Scott":
Thank you for contacting me to express your view on the Protecting the
Right to Organize (PRO) Act. I value your input on this subject and the
opportunity to share my thoughts with you.
The PRO Act, which passed the House last Congress with almost exclusively
party-line Democratic support, represents the most radical and economically
destructive piece of labor legislation in decades. Among dozens of other
anti-worker provisions, the bill would abolish right-to-work protections
across at least 27 states, including South Carolina, forcing many employees
to either financially support a labor union or risk losing their jobs. It
would also forcibly reclassify as many as half of all independent
contractors by nationalizing California's failed "ABC test," which has
wrecked opportunities across hundreds of sectors. The vast majority of
Americans who engage in independent work, from freelance journalism to
app-based driving, appreciate the flexibility and autonomy of their roles,
which the PRO Act would eliminate.
Beyond independent work, the bill would also diminish franchise small
business ownership opportunities, gut the secret ballot for union
elections, and force employers to hand over employees' personal
information--from home addresses and personal phone numbers to hours and
shifts--to union organizers, with no opportunity for workers to opt out.
These policies, along with dozens of others, would result in fewer jobs,
slower growth, and a weaker economy.
While some of the bill's supporters claim that the PRO Act is pro-union,
that argument misses the mark. South Carolina became a right-to-work state
in 1954, and tens of thousands of South Carolinians are union members. That
is their right. That said, the rigid union boss priorities included in the
PRO Act could substantially harm our state's economy. Our state saw 27% job
growth from 2001-2016, with a 10-point increase in personal income. We saw
countless high-tech manufacturing job creators make South Carolina their
home. However, my Democratic colleagues and President Biden want to punish
those who do not want to unionize while harming our state's economy and
squashing the dreams of millions of people living in right-to-work states
like ours. The people, with the hundreds of thousands of jobs that will be
lost, are the ones who will suffer. That is not what I call helping or
protecting employees.
Rest assured, I will do everything I can as your US Senator to stop this
pro-union bosses, anti-economic development and anti-employee piece of
legislation until we have an actual conversation with both parties on this
issue.
Again, thank you for sharing your perspective with me; I hope that you will
continue to do so in the future. If I can ever be of assistance, please do
not hesitate to contact me or a member of my staff.
Unions were never given power in this country. They have always had to fight for it and take it. Today is no different. And one of the first fights that has to be won, one upon which most of the others rest, is to crush once and for all the pernicious belief in this country that what is good for business owners is good for workers.
California’s failed “ABC test,” which has wrecked opportunities across hundreds of sectors.
This is California's ABC test that this guy doesn't like:
The worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the work's performance, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact.
The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business.
The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.
Keep in mind this test is setup like this so that companies aren't hiring shadow employees and not having to give them benefits. This is clearly a worker protection, and it's stupid that this guy is against it.