Tony Illes was working as an Uber Eats delivery person when an ordinance passed last year by the Seattle City Council came into effect in mid-January. The new rule required app companies to pay workers like Illes a minimum wage based on the miles they travel and the minutes they spend on the job. The apps say that this amounts to around $26 an hour, and both Uber Eats and DoorDash responded by adding $5 fees to every order (even when the customer is outside Seattle city limits) while calling for the law to be repealed. According to a recent DoorDash blog post, the ordinance has resulted in an “unprecedented drop in order volume,” a drop that Illes felt personally. He told Geekwire that “demand is dead” and told local TV station KIRO 7, “I didn’t get an order for like six hours and I was done.”
So Illes had an idea: Who needs these apps, anyway? He printed up signs with QR codes directing people to a bare-bones website with his phone number, promising that he would deliver food by bike in Uptown, South Lake Union, Belltown, and a chunk of the downtown core for $5 a pop from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. daily. All you had to do was order the food and send him the screenshot. He called himself “Tony Delivers.”
The dasher picks up my ice cream, does another dash then goes and waits 20 minutes for my sushi for some reason then does another dash.
I was delivered a bag of melted ice cream and the container it was in.
Door dash offered me a refund that was less than the tip and said “they solved my problem” and then I cancelled my dash pass and they can go fuck themselves.
I agree, the delivery services are definitely price gouging to a degree. It sucks that we're charged for delivery, service fees AND the item prices are inflated by around 20% too. Thing is, I think there's a bunch of reasons that TonyDelivers will eventually become as bad as the current market leaders. As his company grows, takes on employees, builds infrastructure, overheads increase, management grows - they'll fall into the same "traps"/profit seeking the other delivery companies have fallen into.
I think the platform that allows efficient distribution of the requests is not that easy to come with. Would need some nice devs to open source one and put it on the fediverse maybe.
Allocating a job to a driver is the easy part. It's all the other stuff people expect from a delivery app that's the hard part. Like having an accurate DB of stores and facilitating orders/payments. If you don't do that then people can troll with fake orders and stiff drivers. Plus moderation of drivers who steal food or are convicted burglars/rapists (existing apps already suck at that).
But a federated approach would be immensely more complicated to do well and is a privacy nightmare. You'd need to share buyer's address and drivers' current locations to many different instances to facilitate a buyer on one instance and potential drivers on several different instances. All that data needs to be available (and accurate to the minute) to the instance that assigns the job. Similar privacy/logistic issues pop up when you consider payments.
Damn, $5 sounds too cheap. I can't imagine ride to store, pick up at store during busy times and ride to the delivery to be less than 20m. That's barely minimum wage. Prob better off at $8 or $10. Still undercut rideshare rates. Then drop only if there's competition.
Yeah, he's biking, assuming he's doing maintenance himself you get a LOT of miles out of a bike for very little upkeep. If he were driving it would be a losing proposition from the start.
According to a recent DoorDash blog post, the ordinance has resulted in an “unprecedented drop in order volume,”
No, you disingenuous stink sacks. Your $5 "you made an order in or around Seattle" fee did that. Orders would've continued unchanged if you hadn't raised fees.
I stopped using food delivery apps last year. The prices were just absurd. If I want takeout, I go get it myself. This all started when I tipped a dasher and the service was awful. The guy stopped somewhere with my food for 15 mins and then delivered it cold and was rude when I asked why he stopped at a location for 15 mins. Tips are for good service, not shitty late-delivered, cold, food!
Last night, I looked on Grubhub for a restaurant, figured out what I wanted and the total was $34 (not including tip). I called the restaurant and went and got it myself, $25. That's a 36% upcharge for the app alone! Not including any tip!
I can honestly say I've never used one. I looked at the prices, realised they were all jacked up before the delivery fees were added, and then just got it myself.
My local Chinese takeaway employs their own guy. I really don't know why we had to farm this problem out to silicon valley shysters.
Same. Last straw for me was when I got a pizza that was transported vertically, so it had folded over and the toppings were everywhere. I bought a pizza bag and a rear carrier for my bike and just go get my food every time now.
He knows what is worth his own time to him. He can take routes only when they make sense to him. I looked at the map and it's an 8 Minute bike ride from middle to corner. That's $20 an hour worst case and $50 an hour on average.
He's making more by cutting out the middleman of Doordash who was profiting off his work.
That's how it was ideally supposed to work, if humans wouldn't be trainable to follow brands and ads.
Sadly they are, so I dunno. Maybe abolishing trademarks and outlawing unrequested ads would work.
After all, it is illegal to do to a person what they haven't requested, right? It is illegal to take a thing from your house without your permission. It should be illegal to put it in there also, it's the same thing mirrored. That would include unrequested ads.
Then we'll see how many people really want to see ads.
It's not about the ads, it's about regulations. The free market dies when regulations get introduced. Especially when these regulations were introduced through lobbying by big corpos, who are trying to protect themselves from competition.
A girl did something like this in brazil but with nudes. She got really popular after she posted videos on tik tok and got sued by the government for advertising porn and then got even more popular.
A cooperative, or co-op, is an organization owned and controlled by the people who use the products or services the business produces. Cooperatives differ from other forms of businesses because they operate more for the benefit of members, rather than to earn profits for investors.
Co-ops are organized to provide competition, improve bargaining power, reduce costs, expand new and existing market opportunities, improve product or service quality, and obtain unavailable products or services (products or services that profit-driven companies don’t offer because they see them as unprofitable).
Cooperatives present lots of opportunities for small business owners and aspiring entrepreneurs. In this post, I’ll go over how cooperatives work, why you should form one, and how you can start one for your business.
These delivery services are prime candidates for cooperatisation... which after a quick search using quotes to filter out "corporatisation" it turns out is a word that serious people use.
Anyway, the reason for this is that they are minimal services - all you need is an app and the ability to get that app on people's phones - and almost no investment in infrastructure.
It would be so easy - conceptually, I know software is hard - to replace that app with a cooperative based model, and you could leverage open source to make a general platform that could be adjusted to individual coops' needs, and allowing a customer to use a single contact point for any affiliated services. Each coop then wouldn't meed to develop their own app, it would be ready made for them.
It could also use federation to link up groups for discovery and to weed out scummy groups.
The fish and chip co-op that used to be nearby was the best - trawlers parked out the back, super fresh produce, generous portions and reasonable prices.
They may require functioning law enforcement more than common kinds of companies, I think.
Well, at least it seems that co-ops were the easiest kind of organizations to victimize in Russian 90s, but I wasn't alive for the most part of it, and then wasn't quite intelligent enough.
That's awesome! Cutting off giant corporations and giving money directly to the person doing the work is exactly what we should be doing. I bet he is making more money than he would have had he worked for any of the food delivery companies even though it's cheaper.
I understand that, but from my personal experience, this is not more stable because companies like these will fire a chunk of their workforce without batting an eye for the slightest shift in the market, whereas a self-employed person will just see a slight decline in demand. Also, the difference in income more than makes up for the perceived stability. Sure it isn't for everyone, but as a consumer, I'd rather most of the money I pay won't go to corporate executive's multi-million dollar salary, but to the people actually providing the service.