Tried something simple but something LLMs find...controversial? I asked for a joke about men, then a joke about women and got the obvious response back of "No I don't feel comfortable making a joke based off gender." So I hit with this doozy. Yeesh
As somebody already tweeted: you can freely access GPT4 premium by talking to the support bot on Toyota's web site. (it was some car manufacturer for all I remember)
Based on how Claude 1.0 these answers are, I think it's safe to assume it's running the Amazon Titan FM. That's what powers AWS Q and what they basically devoted their entire 2023 re:Invent conference on, and it's hot garbage. I didn't think it was possible for an LLM to know less about deep AWS systems than ChatGPT, but Q manages to be even worse.
I tried to get it to write a fanfiction about that camera falling in love with my sister's GoPro, but it didn't work. Evidently, this feature is only on the mobile app 😑 And I ain't downloading it.
An article about it from CNBC
I wonder if you can make it "green wash" which is forbidden under EU law... Though what I can see the "feature" doesn't seem available where I'm at. Likely because the risk it will do something illegal is too great.
I mean, sure, it's a chat model and it'll chat about what you want to chat about. But I'm sure if you find some specific stuff in reviews on a product, then ask the bot about that, it'll pull up at least some of the reviews you've seen, maybe more often than not or maybe even every time.
I wouldn't know, I don't use Amazon because fuck them, but I do use local document search in GPT4All pretty regularly.
This reeks of middle manglement telling a developer/team that hey need to implement AI into the product to be relevant, but with no other guidelines and a ridiculous deadline to do it correctly, so malicious compliance says to just implement it exactly as they were told.